chr3-37020438-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 0P and 0B.

The NM_000249.4(MLH1):​c.1013A>G​(p.Asn338Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000126 in 1,614,198 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MLH1
NM_000249.4 missense

Scores

2
11
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:12B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.82
Variant links:
Genes affected
MLH1 (HGNC:7127): (mutL homolog 1) The protein encoded by this gene can heterodimerize with mismatch repair endonuclease PMS2 to form MutL alpha, part of the DNA mismatch repair system. When MutL alpha is bound by MutS beta and some accessory proteins, the PMS2 subunit of MutL alpha introduces a single-strand break near DNA mismatches, providing an entry point for exonuclease degradation. The encoded protein is also involved in DNA damage signaling and can heterodimerize with DNA mismatch repair protein MLH3 to form MutL gamma, which is involved in meiosis. This gene was identified as a locus frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MLH1NM_000249.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1013A>G p.Asn338Ser missense_variant 11/19 ENST00000231790.8 NP_000240.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MLH1ENST00000231790.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1013A>G p.Asn338Ser missense_variant 11/191 NM_000249.4 ENSP00000231790 P1P40692-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000657
AC:
10
AN:
152194
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000915
AC:
23
AN:
251274
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000110
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
135832
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000924
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000133
AC:
194
AN:
1461886
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000129
AC XY:
94
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000119
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000894
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000927
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000374
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000144
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000248
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000657
AC:
10
AN:
152312
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74482
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000136
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000907
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000576
AC:
7
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:12Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:4Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineAug 12, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ClinVar: VUS by expert panel in 2013, no new evidence suggesting pathogenicity since then -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJul 12, 2022DNA sequence analysis of the MLH1 gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.1013A>G, in exon 11 that results in an amino acid change, p.Asn338Ser. This sequence change has been previously described in individuals with colorectal cancer (PMIDs: 12095971, 23354017, 28874130, 29520894, 18561205) and other cancers including breast and pancreatic cancer (PMIDs: 26898890, 28767289). This sequence change has been described in the gnomAD database with a frequency of 0.012% in the European subpopulation (dbSNP rs63751467). The p.Asn338Ser change affects a moderately conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the MLH1 protein that is not known to be functional. In-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL) provide contradictory results for the p.Asn338Ser substitution. Experimental studies have shown that this variant does not have an impact on mRNA splicing (PMID: 18561205, 31332305) and on mismatch repair activity (PMID: 31784484). Another study reported that this variant does not impact MLH1 function in a methylation tolerance assay (PMID: 30998989) and other study reported that this variant has similar expression level as wildtype protein (PMID: 29520894). An analysis of tumor characteristic from a variant carrier reported a likelihood ratio for pathogenicity of 0.100 (PMID: 31391288). In another study, this variant was shown to have a deleterious effect with an in silico model (PMID: 18383312). While there is suspicion that this variant may not be associated with disease, additional studies are necessary to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Due to contradictory evidence, the clinical significance of the p.Asn338Ser change therefore remains unknown at this time. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoMar 17, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMar 13, 2023Variant summary: MLH1 c.1013A>G (p.Asn338Ser) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 9.2e-05 in 251274 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not higher than the estimated maximum expected for a pathogenic variant in MLH1 causing Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (0.00071), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.1013A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with colorectal cancer and other tumor phenotypes (e.g. Hardt_2011, Pal_2012, Rodriguez-Soler_2013, Caminsky_2016, Rossi_2017, Shindo_2017, Koger_2018, Li_2020, Hu_2020, Mio_2021, Dorling_2021, Pearlman_2021, Brady_2022), but was also found in several cancer-free controls (Dorling_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (MSH2 c.484G>A, p.Gly162Arg; in an internal LCA sample), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. In functional studies the variant was found to have no effect on RNA splicing (Tournier_2008, Morak_2019), protein expression, and protein stability, mismatch repair activity (Koger_2018, Bouvet_2019, Houlleberghs_2019, Rath_2022). 13 other submitters have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant in ClinVar after 2014, mostly without evidence for independent evaluation, and classified the variant as VUS (n=9), likely benign (n=3) or benign (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 04, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthFeb 08, 2023This missense variant replaces asparagine with serine at codon 338 of the MLH1 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have reported that this variant does not impact MLH1 function in a methylation tolerance assay (PMID: 30998989), or the MLH1 protein's stability, damage response signaling, and DNA repair function (doi: 10.1101/2021.12.14.472580). This variant has been detected in at least six individuals affected with Lynch syndrome or associated cancer (PMID: 12095971, 18561205, 21404117, 23047549, 23354017), multiple individuals affected with breast cancer (PMID: 26898890, 33471991), and an individual affected with pancreatic cancer (PMID: 28767289). This variant has also been detected in ten unaffected controls in a large breast cancer case-control study (PMID: 33471991). An analysis of tumor characteristic from a variant carrier reported a likelihood ratio for pathogenicity of 0.100 (PMID: 31391288). This variant has been identified in 24/282676 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Although there is a suspicion that this variant may not be associated with disease, additional evidence is necessary to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Nov 07, 2021- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 04, 2021Dominguez-Valentin M et al. (2013) Hereditary cancer in clinical practice 11 (1):18 (PMID: 24344984); Amendola LM et al. (2015) Genome Res 25 (3):305-15 (PMID: 25637381); Chao EC et al. (2008) Human mutation 29 (6):852-60 (PMID: 18383312); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23741719, 23354017, 18561205, 24344984, 32659497, 21404117, 24096645, 22252508, 12095971, 23047549, 25637381, 18383312, 26898890, 28874130, 29520894, 28767289, 30998989, 31391288, 31784484, 31332305) -
Muir-Torré syndrome;C1333991:Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2;C5399763:Mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 31, 2018- -
Colorectal cancer, non-polyposis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchCSER _CC_NCGL, University of WashingtonJun 01, 2014- -
Lynch syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024This missense variant replaces asparagine with serine at codon 338 of the MLH1 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have reported that this variant does not impact MLH1 function in a methylation tolerance assay (PMID: 30998989), or the MLH1 protein's stability, damage response signaling, and DNA repair function (doi: 10.1101/2021.12.14.472580). This variant has been detected in at least six individuals affected with Lynch syndrome or associated cancer (PMID: 12095971, 18561205, 21404117, 23047549, 23354017), multiple individuals affected with breast cancer (PMID: 26898890, 33471991), and an individual affected with pancreatic cancer (PMID: 28767289). This variant has also been detected in ten unaffected controls in a large breast cancer case-control study (PMID: 33471991). An analysis of tumor characteristic from a variant carrier reported a likelihood ratio for pathogenicity of 0.100 (PMID: 31391288). This variant has been identified in 24/282676 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Although there is a suspicion that this variant may not be associated with disease, additional evidence is necessary to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
MLH1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 28, 2024The MLH1 c.1013A>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Asn338Ser. This variant has been reported in individuals with Lynch syndrome, colorectal, breast, pancreatic, or ovarian cancers (Rossi et al. 2002. PubMed ID: 12095971; Rodríguez-Soler et al. 2013. PubMed ID: 23354017; Pal et al. 2012. PubMed ID: 23047549; Hardt et al. 2011. PubMed ID: 21404117; Shindo et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 28767289). This variant is reported in 0.012% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD and has conflicting interpretations regarding its pathogenicity in ClinVar, ranging from benign to uncertain (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/89605/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The MLH1 p.Asn338Ser variant was identified in 5 of 7614 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with colon, and ovarian cancer (Chao 2008, Hardt 2011, Pal 2012, Rodriguez-Soler 2013). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs63751467) as “With Uncertain significance allele”, in ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Ambry Genetics; classified as uncertain significance by Invitae, GeneDx, Color Genomics and 4 clinical laboratories), Clinvitae, UMD-LSDB (5X as unclassified variant), Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database, and the Insight Hereditary Tumors Database (15X Class3). The variant was not identified in COGR, Cosmic, MutDB, or the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 23 of 277060 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0001 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 1 of 24032 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), Latino in 2 of 34418 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), European in 16 of 126584 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), Finnish in 2 of 25792 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), and South Asian in 2 of 30780 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001); it was not observed in the “Other”, Ashkenazi Jewish, or East Asian populations. Several publications provide inconsistent predictions regarding the effect of the variant on protein and splicing. The variant was shown to have a deleterious effect with an in silico model (Chao 2008), while the variant has no effect on splicing in the pCAS ExVivo Splicing Assay (Tournier 2008). The p.Asn338 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 4 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. However, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsSep 11, 2024This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following: it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease, and/or has normal protein function, and/or has lack of segregation with disease, and/or has been detected in co-occurrence with known pathogenic variant, and/or has lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or is located in a region inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationGerman Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital CologneSep 09, 2024According to the ClinGen InSiGHT ACMG MLH1 v1.0.0 criteria we chose these criteria: BP4 (supporting benign): HCI-prior probability of pathogenicity <0.11, BS1 (strong benign): gnomADv4 Grpmax FAF von >0.01% in NFE, BS3 (supporting benign): Functional Assay show no impact on protein function -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.010
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.020
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.67
D;.;.;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.33
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.37
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
D;D;.;.;.;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.15
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.58
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.68
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.5
M;.;.;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.43
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.6
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.67
Sift
Benign
0.17
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.28
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.51
P;.;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.82
MVP
0.93
MPC
0.092
ClinPred
0.50
T
GERP RS
4.1
Varity_R
0.12
gMVP
0.25

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs63751467; hg19: chr3-37061929; API