chr3-37047595-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 1P and 13B. PP3BP4BP6_Very_StrongBS1

The NM_000249.4(MLH1):​c.1808C>G​(p.Pro603Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000105 in 1,614,044 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P603L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000085 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MLH1
NM_000249.4 missense

Scores

11
6
2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.70

Publications

21 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MLH1 (HGNC:7127): (mutL homolog 1) The protein encoded by this gene can heterodimerize with mismatch repair endonuclease PMS2 to form MutL alpha, part of the DNA mismatch repair system. When MutL alpha is bound by MutS beta and some accessory proteins, the PMS2 subunit of MutL alpha introduces a single-strand break near DNA mismatches, providing an entry point for exonuclease degradation. The encoded protein is also involved in DNA damage signaling and can heterodimerize with DNA mismatch repair protein MLH3 to form MutL gamma, which is involved in meiosis. This gene was identified as a locus frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
MLH1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Lynch syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Lynch syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
  • Muir-Torre syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet
  • mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Lynch syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • malignant pancreatic neoplasm
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • rhabdomyosarcoma
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • prostate cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • breast cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.

PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 11: BayesDel_addAF, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Eigen, M_CAP, MutationAssessor, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PrimateAI, PROVEAN, REVEL, REVEL [when max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.3170259).
BP6
Variant 3-37047595-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-37047595-C-G is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 41636.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000107 (157/1461870) while in subpopulation MID AF = 0.00225 (13/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00133. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 86 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MLH1NM_000249.4 linkc.1808C>G p.Pro603Arg missense_variant Exon 16 of 19 ENST00000231790.8 NP_000240.1 P40692-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MLH1ENST00000231790.8 linkc.1808C>G p.Pro603Arg missense_variant Exon 16 of 19 1 NM_000249.4 ENSP00000231790.3 P40692-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000921
AC:
14
AN:
152056
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000656
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00202
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000159
AC:
40
AN:
251344
AF XY:
0.000177
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00278
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000528
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000653
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000107
AC:
157
AN:
1461870
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000118
AC XY:
86
AN XY:
727242
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000671
AC:
3
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00241
AC:
63
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000464
AC:
4
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00225
AC:
13
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000513
AC:
57
AN:
1111994
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000281
AC:
17
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.487
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12
24
37
49
61
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000854
AC:
13
AN:
152174
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000806
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74410
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000655
AC:
1
AN:
15274
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10602
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000441
AC:
3
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.486
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
4
5
6
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000348
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000140
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000132
AC:
16
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:18
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2 Uncertain:1Benign:3
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 26, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 27363726]. Homozygosity for this variant has been confirmed in one or more individuals lacking clinical features consistent with gene-specific recessive disease, indicating that this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. -

Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Jul 13, 2012
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

- -

Nov 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

MLH1: PP3, BS3 -

Mar 04, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 11726306, 17510385, 21404117, 23047549, 23741719, 19117025, 22736432, 24362816, 22949387, 22703879, 25871441, 18561205, 22290698, 31784484) -

Jul 10, 2022
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Dec 19, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Mar 07, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 22, 2024
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

not specified Benign:2
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 03, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: MLH1 c.1808C>G (p.Pro603Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the DNA mismatch repair protein Mlh1, C-terminal domain (IPR032189) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00016 in 251344 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in MLH1 causing Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (0.00016 vs 0.00071), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. However, it is predominantly observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0028 (28/10076). This frequency is about 4 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic MLH1 variant (0.0007105), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of Ashkenazi Jewish origin. c.1808C>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with a variety of cancers such as Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer/Lynch syndrome, epithelial ovarian cancer (example, Hardt_2011, Tournier_2008, Pal_2012). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer/Lynch syndrome. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported in the UMD database (MLH1 complete gene deletion), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Several publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (example, Takahashi_2007, Drost_2018). The most pronounced variant effect results in 82.5% normal mismatch repair (MMR) activity (Takahashi_2007), while a subsequent study reports 97% of normal mismatch repair (MMR) activity (Drost_2018). Furthermore, binding partner interaction as determined by Y2H assays is +, Nuclear localization as determined by transfections of fluorescently tagged proteins combined with microscopy is + (Drost_2018). Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation with a predominant consensus as likely benign/benign (n=7) (VUS, n=2). Some submitters cite overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Lynch syndrome Benign:2
Sep 05, 2013
International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:research

Multifactorial likelihood analysis posterior probability 0.001-0.049 -

Sep 24, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Muir-Torré syndrome Benign:1
Feb 01, 2025
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

MLH1-related disorder Benign:1
Apr 09, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Jan 26, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The MLH1 p.Pro603Arg variant was identified in 6 of 4996 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from individuals or families with lynch syndrome and ovarian cancer (Pal 2012, South 2009, Hardt 2011, Borras 2012, Tournier 2008). The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs63750876) as “with uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (classified as likely benign by GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, Integrated Genetics, Color and 2 other submitters, uncertain significance by Prevention Genetics and NIH and benign by Invitae and Quest Diagnostics) and UMD-LSDB (observed 4x). The variant was identified in control databases in 44 of 282,716 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Ashkenazi Jewish in 29 of 10,366 chromosomes (freq: 0.003 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant), Other in 5 of 7218 chromosomes (freq: 0.0007), European in 8 of 129,068 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006), Latino in 2 of 35,438 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006), while the variant was not observed in the African, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. Expression of the variant in yeast and human cells had no demonstrated effect on MLH1 protein levels, MMR activity and splicing (Norras 2012, Hardt 2011, Tournier 2008, Takahashi 2007). The p.Pro603 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.44
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.36
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.46
CADD
Pathogenic
27
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.84
D;.;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.86
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.83
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
D;D;.;.;.;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.41
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.32
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
0.96
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.0
M;.;.;.;.;.
PhyloP100
7.7
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.81
D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-4.4
D;D;D;D;D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.82
Sift
Uncertain
0.013
D;D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.014
D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.97
D;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.71
MVP
0.94
MPC
0.39
ClinPred
0.30
T
GERP RS
5.6
Varity_R
0.75
gMVP
0.61
Mutation Taster
=9/91
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicevardb
1.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs63750876; hg19: chr3-37089086; COSMIC: COSV51625001; API