chr3-37048557-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PP3_Strong

The NM_000249.4(MLH1):​c.1937A>G​(p.Tyr646Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000595 in 1,613,774 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000060 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MLH1
NM_000249.4 missense

Scores

12
5
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.94
Variant links:
Genes affected
MLH1 (HGNC:7127): (mutL homolog 1) The protein encoded by this gene can heterodimerize with mismatch repair endonuclease PMS2 to form MutL alpha, part of the DNA mismatch repair system. When MutL alpha is bound by MutS beta and some accessory proteins, the PMS2 subunit of MutL alpha introduces a single-strand break near DNA mismatches, providing an entry point for exonuclease degradation. The encoded protein is also involved in DNA damage signaling and can heterodimerize with DNA mismatch repair protein MLH3 to form MutL gamma, which is involved in meiosis. This gene was identified as a locus frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points.

PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.972

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MLH1NM_000249.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1937A>G p.Tyr646Cys missense_variant 17/19 ENST00000231790.8 NP_000240.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MLH1ENST00000231790.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1937A>G p.Tyr646Cys missense_variant 17/191 NM_000249.4 ENSP00000231790 P1P40692-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
151998
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000242
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000656
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000946
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000438
AC:
11
AN:
251332
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000589
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
135824
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000792
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000602
AC:
88
AN:
1461776
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000605
AC XY:
44
AN XY:
727202
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000728
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
151998
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74242
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000242
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000656
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000946
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000574
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000416
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
4
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:13
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJan 16, 2024This missense variant replaces tyrosine with cysteine at codon 646 of the MLH1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have shown conflicting results with regard to the variant's impact on MLH1 protein interaction with PMS2 protein (PMID: 16083711, 16724012, 22753075). Multiple studies have shown that this variant does not affect mismatch repair activity (PMID: 16083711, 16724012, 20020535, 22753075). This variant has been reported in individuals affected with Lynch syndrome and Lynch syndrome-associated cancer (PMID: 11870161, 16083711, 16724012, 17250665, 21404117, 23047549, 25110875, 30521064). Tumor data from these individuals show conflicting evidence, with variability in microsatellite stability and protein expression via immunohistochemistry analysis (PMID: 11870161, 16083711, 16724012, 17250665, 21404117). This variant has also been observed in individuals affected with breast cancer or gastric cancer (PMID: 31650731, 36627197). This variant has also been identified in 12/282716 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsOct 10, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJan 12, 2024The p.Y646C variant (also known as c.1937A>G), located in coding exon 17 of the MLH1 gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 1937. The tyrosine at codon 646 is replaced by cysteine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This alteration has been reported in multiple individuals with clinical histories suspicious for Lynch syndrome, although tumor test results have been inconsistent (Scartozzi M et al. J. Clin. Oncol. 2002 Mar;20:1203-8; Hampel H et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005 May;352:1851-60; Raevaara TE et al. Gastroenterology. 2005 Aug;129:537-49; Belvederesi L et al. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2006 Jul;14:853-9; Hardt K et al. Fam. Cancer. 2011 Jun;10:273-84; Ambry internal data). Functional analyses of the p.Y646C variant have produced conflicting results. Two independent studies have shown this alteration to disrupt PMS2 interaction (Belvederesi L et al. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2006 Jul;14:853-9; Andersen SD et al. Hum. Mutat. 2012 Dec;33:1647-55), while another supported normal interaction (Raevaara TE et al. Gastroenterology. 2005 Aug;129:537-49). Multiple studies have demonstrated normal localization, normal mismatch repair activity, and expression similar to wild type (Andersen SD et al. Hum. Mutat. 2012 Dec;33:1647-55; Belvederesi L et al. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2006 Jul;14:853-9; Raevaara TE et al. Gastroenterology. 2005 Aug;129:537-49; Drost M et al. Hum. Mutat. 2010 Mar;31:247-53); however, one functional assay in yeast showed an intermediate activity level (Vogelsang M et al. BMC Cancer. 2009 Oct;9:382). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is conflicting at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jun 23, 2021- -
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 05, 2024Observed in individuals with Lynch-syndrome associated cancers and/or polyps, with most tumors demonstrating absence of MLH1 protein expression and/or microsatellite instability; however, one tumor also demonstrated MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (PMID: 11870161, 17250665, 21404117, 25110875, 25980754, 32661327, 15256438, 15872200); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31650731, 19389263, 32547938, 22949387, 19863800, 22753075, 16083711, 15256438, 20020535, 23047549, 21120944, 17594722, 25980754, 25372392, 22426235, 17192056, 25186627, 18383312, 18951440, 29368341, 24073290, 15872200, 11870161, 17250665, 21404117, 25110875, 16724012, 30521064, 32068069, 32661327, 34039291, 35467778, 35449176, 34326862, 32756484, 12799449, 20533529, 31830689, 36627197) -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The MLH1 p.Tyr646Cys variant was identified in 3 of 6722 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0004) from individuals or families with Lynch syndrome, ovarian cancer, and colorectal cancer and was not identified in 870 chromosomes from healthy individuals (Yurgelun 2015, Pal 2012, Hampel 2005). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs35045067) “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (classified uncertain significance, reviewed by an expert panel in 2013; submitters: InSIGHT, Ambry Genetics, GeneDx, Invitae, and Laboratory Corporation of America), UMD-LSDB (1x, unclassified variant), and Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database. The c.1937A>G variant was not identified in COGR, Cosmic, MutDB, Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, or the Insight Hereditary Tumors Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 12 of 277044 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00004 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following populations: European in 9 of 126552 chromosomes (freq: 0.00007), African in 1 of 24036 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), Latino in 1 of 34418 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), and East Asian in 1 of 18862 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005); it was not observed in the Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, Finnish, or South Asian populations. Functional assays on this variant report conflicting assessments of pathogenicity (Andersen 2012, Belvederesi 2006, Drost 2010, Nakagawa 2004, Raevaara 2005, Vogelsang 2009). The p.Tyr646 residue is conserved across mammals and other organisms and 5 of 5 computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoSep 05, 2023In the published literature, it has been reported in individuals affected with colon cancer (PMID: 15872200 (2005), 16724012 (2006), 21404117 (2011), 25110875 (2015), 25980754 (2015), 30521064 (2019)), breast cancer (PMID: 11870161 (2002), 25186627 (2015), 31650731 (2020), 32547938 (2020)), ovarian cancer (PMID: 23047549 (2012)), and prostate cancer (PMID: 29368341 (2018)). Functional studies were conflicting particularly when evaluating binding to PMS2 (PMID: 16083711 (2005), 16724012 (2006), 22753075 (2012)). A study in yeast observing mutation rates (PMID: 19863800 (2009)) also suggests pathogenicity. However, mismatch repair activity has been reported to be proficient (PMID: 16083711 (2005), 20020535 (2010)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00007 (9/129044 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 15, 2024Variant summary: MLH1 c.1937A>G (p.Tyr646Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the DNA mismatch repair protein Mlh1, C-terminal domain (IPR032189) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.4e-05 in 251732 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in MLH1 causing Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (4.4e-05 vs 0.00071), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.1937A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with prostate cancer, breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer, gastric cancer, HNPCC or HNPCC-related cancers, all without strong evidence for causality (Scartozzi_2002, Nakagawa_2004, Belvederesi_2006, Hardt_2011, Yurgelun_2015, IsaacssonVelho_2018, Jiang_2019, Kwong_2020, Yoo_2020, Nikitin_2020, Xiao_2020, Talbot_2021, Hu_2022, Brady_2022, Zhang_2023). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer. A co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported (BRCA1 c.5266dupC, p.Q1756fs), providing supporting evidence for a benign role (Nikitin_2020). In vitro functional studies provided conflicting results in relation to binding of this MLH1 Y646C mutant with PMS2 (Raevaara_2005, Belvederesi_2006, Drost_2011, Andersen_2012). Localization and expression of this variant and MMR activity of this mutant were found to be normal (Raevaara_2005, Belvederesi_2006, Vogelsang_2009, Drost_2011, Andersen_2012). However, in vitro measurement of mutation rate of this mutant was highly impaired (Vogelsang_2009) and it was also defective in binding with Exo1 protein (Andersen_2012). Thus, based on the functional assays, it is uncertain whether this variant leads to functional impairment. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 19389263, 18383312, 15256438, 21120944, 16724012, 17250665, 20020535, 17192056, 16083711, 11870161). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 36545). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalJul 31, 2024- -
Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsMar 09, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJul 25, 2017- -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 18, 2024This sequence change replaces tyrosine, which is neutral and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 646 of the MLH1 protein (p.Tyr646Cys). This variant is present in population databases (rs35045067, gnomAD 0.007%). This missense change has been observed in individuals with clinical features of Lynch syndrome (PMID: 11870161, 30521064; Invitae). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 36545). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt MLH1 protein function with a positive predictive value of 95%. Experimental studies are conflicting or provide insufficient evidence to determine the effect of this variant on MLH1 function (PMID: 16083711, 16724012, 19863800, 20020535, 22753075). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. -
Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDing PR Lab, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center-- -
Lynch syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024This missense variant replaces tyrosine with cysteine at codon 646 of the MLH1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have shown conflicting results with regard to the variant's impact on MLH1 protein interaction with PMS2 protein (PMID: 16083711, 16724012, 22753075). Multiple studies have shown that this variant does not affect mismatch repair activity (PMID: 16083711, 16724012, 20020535, 22753075). This variant has been reported in individuals affected with Lynch syndrome and Lynch syndrome-associated cancer (PMID: 11870161, 16083711, 16724012, 17250665, 21404117, 23047549, 25110875, 30521064). Tumor data from these individuals show conflicting evidence, with variability in microsatellite stability and protein expression via immunohistochemistry analysis (PMID: 11870161, 16083711, 16724012, 17250665, 21404117). This variant has also been observed in individuals affected with breast cancer or gastric cancer (PMID: 31650731, 36627197). This variant has also been identified in 12/282716 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.25
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.36
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.47
CADD
Pathogenic
27
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.90
D;.;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.94
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.90
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.93
D;D;.;.;.;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.59
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.97
D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
0.95
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.7
H;.;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.71
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-8.3
D;D;D;D;D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.96
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0030
D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.88
MVP
0.95
MPC
0.45
ClinPred
0.99
D
GERP RS
5.8
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.96
gMVP
0.91

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35045067; hg19: chr3-37090048; API