chr3-38039377-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Moderate
The NM_007335.4(DLEC1):āc.152A>Gā(p.Tyr51Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000112 in 1,614,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007335.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLEC1 | NM_007335.4 | c.152A>G | p.Tyr51Cys | missense_variant | 1/37 | ENST00000308059.11 | NP_031361.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLEC1 | ENST00000308059.11 | c.152A>G | p.Tyr51Cys | missense_variant | 1/37 | 1 | NM_007335.4 | ENSP00000308597.6 | ||
DLEC1 | ENST00000346219.7 | c.152A>G | p.Tyr51Cys | missense_variant | 1/36 | 1 | ENSP00000315914.5 | |||
DLEC1 | ENST00000440294.6 | n.173A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/17 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000112 AC: 17AN: 152088Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000457 AC: 114AN: 249316Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000421 AC XY: 57AN XY: 135294
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000112 AC: 164AN: 1461846Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000103 AC XY: 75AN XY: 727228
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000112 AC: 17AN: 152206Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000161 AC XY: 12AN XY: 74422
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 31, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at