chr3-38579455-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001099404.2(SCN5A):​c.3269C>T​(p.Pro1090Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000773 in 1,612,406 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P1090Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00075 ( 16 hom. )

Consequence

SCN5A
NM_001099404.2 missense

Scores

2
15

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:22O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.108

Publications

43 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN5A (HGNC:10593): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 5) The protein encoded by this gene is an integral membrane protein and tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated sodium channel subunit. This protein is found primarily in cardiac muscle and is responsible for the initial upstroke of the action potential in an electrocardiogram. Defects in this gene have been associated with long QT syndrome type 3 (LQT3), atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, and Brugada syndrome 1, all autosomal dominant cardiac diseases. Alternative splicing results in several transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
SCN5A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Brugada syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Brugada syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • dilated cardiomyopathy 1E
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • familial long QT syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • long QT syndrome 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • sick sinus syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • progressive familial heart block, type 1A
    Inheritance: SD, AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
  • atrial standstill
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial atrial fibrillation
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial sick sinus syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • paroxysmal familial ventricular fibrillation
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • progressive familial heart block
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
  • short QT syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.003657341).
BP6
Variant 3-38579455-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38579455-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 48298.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00101 (154/152288) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0217 (112/5168). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0184. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 93 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 16 SD,AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SCN5ANM_001099404.2 linkc.3269C>T p.Pro1090Leu missense_variant Exon 18 of 28 ENST00000413689.6 NP_001092874.1
SCN5ANM_000335.5 linkc.3266C>T p.Pro1089Leu missense_variant Exon 18 of 28 ENST00000423572.7 NP_000326.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SCN5AENST00000413689.6 linkc.3269C>T p.Pro1090Leu missense_variant Exon 18 of 28 5 NM_001099404.2 ENSP00000410257.1
SCN5AENST00000423572.7 linkc.3266C>T p.Pro1089Leu missense_variant Exon 18 of 28 1 NM_000335.5 ENSP00000398266.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00102
AC:
155
AN:
152170
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0218
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00228
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00167
AC:
411
AN:
245980
AF XY:
0.00155
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000669
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000582
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000603
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0204
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000271
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00117
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000749
AC:
1093
AN:
1460118
Hom.:
16
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000781
AC XY:
567
AN XY:
726310
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000119
AC:
4
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000671
AC:
3
AN:
44684
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00103
AC:
27
AN:
26108
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0215
AC:
855
AN:
39684
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00113
AC:
97
AN:
86170
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000190
AC:
1
AN:
52534
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000175
AC:
1
AN:
5724
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000342
AC:
38
AN:
1111410
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00111
AC:
67
AN:
60330
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
54
109
163
218
272
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00101
AC:
154
AN:
152288
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00125
AC XY:
93
AN XY:
74458
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000457
AC:
19
AN:
41560
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000576
AC:
2
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0217
AC:
112
AN:
5168
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00228
AC:
11
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000735
AC:
5
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
3
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
12
19
25
31
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000692
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00118
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000247
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00159
AC:
192
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00664
AC:
23
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:22Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Nov 05, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Pro1090Leu in exon 18 of SCN5A: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 2.1% (12/572) of chromosomes from a broad, though clinically and racially unspecified population from 1000 Genomes Project (http://1000genomes.org; rs1805125). Pro1090Leu in exon 18 of SCN5A (r s1805125; allele frequency = 2.1%, 12/572) -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 30, 2011
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

not provided Benign:4Other:1
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:literature only

This variant has been reported in the following publications (PMID:10807545;PMID:15689442;PMID:16155735;PMID:18426444;PMID:19841300;PMID:20129283). -

Nov 09, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

SCN5A: PP3, BS1, BS2 -

Brugada syndrome 1 Benign:1
May 09, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Ventricular fibrillation, paroxysmal familial, type 1 Benign:1
May 09, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME;C1832680:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1E;C1837845:Sick sinus syndrome 1;C1859062:Long QT syndrome 3;C1879286:Progressive familial heart block, type 1A;C2751898:Ventricular fibrillation, paroxysmal familial, type 1;C3151464:Atrial fibrillation, familial, 10;C4551804:Brugada syndrome 1 Benign:1
May 31, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Brugada syndrome Benign:1
May 17, 2019
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, BC Children's and BC Women's Hospitals
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:1
May 08, 2018
Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1E Benign:1
May 09, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Sick sinus syndrome 1 Benign:1
May 09, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Progressive familial heart block, type 1A Benign:1
May 09, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Long QT syndrome 3 Benign:1
May 09, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Mar 25, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Cardiac arrhythmia Benign:1
Mar 19, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.067
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.31
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.19
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.68
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.46
.;.;.;.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.0
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.13
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.62
.;T;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0037
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.35
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
2.0
.;.;.;.;M;.
PhyloP100
-0.11
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.76
N;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.32
Sift
Benign
0.069
T;T;T;T;D;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.60
T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.056
B;B;.;B;B;B
Vest4
0.085
MVP
0.26
MPC
0.034
ClinPred
0.012
T
GERP RS
-0.55
Varity_R
0.029
gMVP
0.59
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1805125; hg19: chr3-38620946; COSMIC: COSV100349564; API