chr3-38603929-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000335.5(SCN5A):​c.1673A>G​(p.His558Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.231 in 1,613,720 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 43,974 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.25 ( 4753 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.23 ( 39221 hom. )

Consequence

SCN5A
NM_000335.5 missense

Scores

1
17

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts P:1B:28O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.28
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN5A (HGNC:10593): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 5) The protein encoded by this gene is an integral membrane protein and tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated sodium channel subunit. This protein is found primarily in cardiac muscle and is responsible for the initial upstroke of the action potential in an electrocardiogram. Defects in this gene have been associated with long QT syndrome type 3 (LQT3), atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, and Brugada syndrome 1, all autosomal dominant cardiac diseases. Alternative splicing results in several transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant in the SCN5A gene, where missense mutations are typically associated with disease (based on misZ statistic). The gene has 99 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 60 curated benign missense variants. Gene score misZ: 2.7504 (below the threshold of 3.09). Trascript score misZ: 4.8279 (above the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to progressive familial heart block, type 1A, Brugada syndrome, familial sick sinus syndrome, short QT syndrome, paroxysmal familial ventricular fibrillation, progressive familial heart block, long QT syndrome 3, familial atrial fibrillation, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, dilated cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy 1E, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, Brugada syndrome 1, atrial standstill, familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy, familial long QT syndrome, sick sinus syndrome 1.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.002580464).
BP6
Variant 3-38603929-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38603929-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 48289.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr3-38603929-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr3-38603929-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.29 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SCN5ANM_001099404.2 linkc.1673A>G p.His558Arg missense_variant Exon 12 of 28 ENST00000413689.6 NP_001092874.1 Q14524H9KVD2
SCN5ANM_000335.5 linkc.1673A>G p.His558Arg missense_variant Exon 12 of 28 ENST00000423572.7 NP_000326.2 Q14524-2Q86V90

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SCN5AENST00000413689.6 linkc.1673A>G p.His558Arg missense_variant Exon 12 of 28 5 NM_001099404.2 ENSP00000410257.1 H9KVD2
SCN5AENST00000423572.7 linkc.1673A>G p.His558Arg missense_variant Exon 12 of 28 1 NM_000335.5 ENSP00000398266.2 Q14524-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.245
AC:
37263
AN:
151978
Hom.:
4732
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.293
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.339
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.230
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.188
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.101
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.241
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.197
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.222
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.240
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.220
AC:
54882
AN:
249044
Hom.:
6383
AF XY:
0.223
AC XY:
30153
AN XY:
135142
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.292
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.216
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.201
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0933
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.247
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.200
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.230
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.228
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.230
AC:
335541
AN:
1461624
Hom.:
39221
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.231
AC XY:
167767
AN XY:
727106
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.294
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.219
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.197
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0938
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.240
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.199
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.234
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.233
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.246
AC:
37344
AN:
152096
Hom.:
4753
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.245
AC XY:
18242
AN XY:
74342
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.294
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.230
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.188
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.101
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.242
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.197
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.240
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.241
Alfa
AF:
0.235
Hom.:
10325
Bravo
AF:
0.249
TwinsUK
AF:
0.234
AC:
869
ALSPAC
AF:
0.230
AC:
885
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.275
AC:
1151
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.232
AC:
1957
ExAC
AF:
0.221
AC:
26760
Asia WGS
AF:
0.202
AC:
702
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.246
EpiControl
AF:
0.234

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Benign:28Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Aug 09, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

27% (1151/5339) of Afr Amer chrom in ESP -

Mar 05, 2020
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 22, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Pathogenic:1Benign:6Other:1
Nov 20, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 18, 2011
Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford University
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: provider interpretation

- -

-
Biology Molecular and Stem Cell Facilities Laboratory, National Cardiovascular Center, Harapan Kita Hospital
Significance: Pathogenic
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: research

Allele Freq Eas (0.1012); Sift: tolerated (1); PolyPhen: benign (0) -

Nov 28, 2022
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

-
Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: literature only

This variant has been reported in the following publications (PMID:10807545;PMID:11463728;PMID:11997281;PMID:12569159;PMID:12639704;PMID:14760488;PMID:14985827;PMID:15161528;PMID:15599693;PMID:15689442;PMID:16132053;PMID:16155735;PMID:16239976;PMID:16712702;PMID:17161064;PMID:17210839;PMID:17675083;PMID:17993325;PMID:18093912;PMID:18156160;PMID:18362431;PMID:18426444;PMID:19083750;PMID:19841300;PMID:20129283). -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Apr 20, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Brugada syndrome 1 Benign:3
May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Jan 01, 2019
Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ventricular fibrillation, paroxysmal familial, type 1 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME;C1832680:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1E;C1837845:Sick sinus syndrome 1;C1859062:Long QT syndrome 3;C1879286:Progressive familial heart block, type 1A;C2751898:Ventricular fibrillation, paroxysmal familial, type 1;C3151464:Atrial fibrillation, familial, 10;C4551804:Brugada syndrome 1 Benign:1
Apr 28, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Congenital long QT syndrome Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1E Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Sick sinus syndrome 1 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Progressive familial heart block, type 1A Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Primary dilated cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Sep 27, 2022
Cohesion Phenomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Long QT syndrome 3 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Mar 16, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Cardiac arrhythmia Benign:1
Mar 15, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.056
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.41
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.22
CADD
Benign
1.1
DANN
Benign
0.29
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.41
.;.;.;.;.;T;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.5
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.024
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.19
.;T;T;T;T;T;T;.;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0026
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.92
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-2.6
.;N;.;.;.;N;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.30
T
PROVEAN
Benign
3.9
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.29
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;B;.;B;.;B;B;.;.
Vest4
0.029
MPC
0.42
ClinPred
0.0038
T
GERP RS
2.4
Varity_R
0.032
gMVP
0.70

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1805124; hg19: chr3-38645420; COSMIC: COSV61125544; API