chr3-4521038-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP2PP3_ModeratePP5
The NM_001378452.1(ITPR1):c.107G>A(p.Arg36His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000685 in 1,460,882 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001378452.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITPR1 | NM_001378452.1 | c.107G>A | p.Arg36His | missense_variant | 4/62 | ENST00000649015.2 | NP_001365381.1 | |
ITPR1 | NM_001168272.2 | c.107G>A | p.Arg36His | missense_variant | 4/61 | NP_001161744.1 | ||
ITPR1 | NM_001099952.4 | c.107G>A | p.Arg36His | missense_variant | 4/59 | NP_001093422.2 | ||
ITPR1 | NM_002222.7 | c.107G>A | p.Arg36His | missense_variant | 4/58 | NP_002213.5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITPR1 | ENST00000649015.2 | c.107G>A | p.Arg36His | missense_variant | 4/62 | NM_001378452.1 | ENSP00000497605 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1460882Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726784
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:3
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2020 | - - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 14, 2016 | The R36H variant in the ITPR1 gene has not been reported previously as a pathogenic variant, nor as a benign variant, to our knowledge. The R36H variant was not observed in approximately 6,000 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, indicating it is not a common benign variant in these populations. The R36H variant is a conservative amino acid substitution, which is not likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues share similar properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is conserved across species. In silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function. The R36H variant is a strong candidate for a pathogenic variant, however the possibility it may be a rare benign variant cannot be excluded. - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 29, 2022 | In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. This variant disrupts the p.Arg36 amino acid residue in ITPR1. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 27572814, 28620721). This suggests that this residue is clinically significant, and that variants that disrupt this residue are likely to be disease-causing. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt ITPR1 protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 372854). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with ITPR1-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with histidine, which is basic and polar, at codon 36 of the ITPR1 protein (p.Arg36His). - |
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 26, 2020 | The alteration results in an amino acid change:_x000D_ _x000D_ The c.107G>A (p.R36H) alteration is located in exon 4 (coding exon 2) of the ITPR1 gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 107, causing the arginine (R) at amino acid position 36 to be replaced by a histidine (H). The alteration is not observed in population databases: _x000D_ _x000D_ Based on data from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), the ITPR1 c.107G>A alteration was not observed, with coverage at this position. The altered amino acid is conserved throughout evolution:_x000D_ _x000D_ The p.R36 amino acid is conserved in available vertebrate species. The amino acid is located in a functionally important protein domain:_x000D_ _x000D_ The p.R36 amino acid is located in the N-terminal supressor domain of the IP3 receptor type 1 isoform 2 protein. This domain functions in attenuating the affinity of the IP3-binding core domain to a physiological range, and is also a binding target for many proteins that modulate the channel activity of the receptor. The domain contains a head subdomain forming a beta-trefoil fold. The R36 residue is located on the molecular surface of the head subdomain and could potentially interact simultaneously with the core domain; indeed it was found that mutating this residue to R36E significantly increased IP3 binding affinity (Bosanac, 2002b). The alteration is predicted deleterious by in silico modeling:_x000D_ _x000D_ The p.R36H alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at