chr3-53092502-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 14 ACMG points: 14P and 0B. PM2PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_052859.4(RFT1):c.1325G>A(p.Arg442Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000212 in 1,460,118 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R442W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_052859.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- RFT1-congenital disorder of glycosylationInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 14 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_052859.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFT1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1325G>A | p.Arg442Gln | missense | Exon 12 of 13 | ENSP00000296292.3 | Q96AA3 | ||
| ENSG00000272305 | TSL:5 | n.188G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 5 | ENSP00000475819.1 | U3KQE9 | |||
| RFT1 | c.1511G>A | p.Arg504Gln | missense | Exon 13 of 14 | ENSP00000579856.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000162 AC: 4AN: 246288 AF XY: 0.0000151 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000212 AC: 31AN: 1460118Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000151 AC XY: 11AN XY: 726100 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at