chr3-53092557-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_052859.4(RFT1):c.1270C>A(p.Arg424Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000657 in 152,114 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/24 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R424H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_052859.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- RFT1-congenital disorder of glycosylationInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, ClinGen, Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFT1 | ENST00000296292.8 | c.1270C>A | p.Arg424Ser | missense_variant | Exon 12 of 13 | 1 | NM_052859.4 | ENSP00000296292.3 | ||
| ENSG00000272305 | ENST00000607283.5 | n.133C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 2 of 5 | 5 | ENSP00000475819.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152114Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000809 AC: 2AN: 247068 AF XY: 0.0000150 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152114Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74306 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at