chr3-55479499-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_Strong
The NM_003392.7(WNT5A):c.206G>A(p.Cys69Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. C69G) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003392.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNT5A | NM_003392.7 | c.206G>A | p.Cys69Tyr | missense_variant | 3/5 | ENST00000264634.9 | NP_003383.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNT5A | ENST00000264634.9 | c.206G>A | p.Cys69Tyr | missense_variant | 3/5 | 1 | NM_003392.7 | ENSP00000264634.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal dominant Robinow syndrome 1 Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Sep 01, 2017 | This variant was previously reported as pathogenic and was found once in our laboratory de novo in a 1-year-old male with dysmorphic features, mesomelia, brachydactyly, micropenis. - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | GeneReviews | - | - - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Jan 01, 2015 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at