chr3-69119576-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PM2PP3_StrongPP5
The NM_198271.5(LMOD3):c.779T>C(p.Leu260Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L260L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_198271.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- nemaline myopathy 10Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P
- typical nemaline myopathyInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- severe congenital nemaline myopathyInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_198271.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMOD3 | NM_198271.5 | MANE Select | c.779T>C | p.Leu260Pro | missense | Exon 2 of 3 | NP_938012.2 | ||
| LMOD3 | NM_001304418.3 | c.779T>C | p.Leu260Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 4 | NP_001291347.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMOD3 | ENST00000420581.7 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.779T>C | p.Leu260Pro | missense | Exon 2 of 3 | ENSP00000414670.3 | ||
| LMOD3 | ENST00000475434.1 | TSL:5 | c.779T>C | p.Leu260Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 4 | ENSP00000418645.1 | ||
| LMOD3 | ENST00000489031.5 | TSL:2 | c.779T>C | p.Leu260Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 4 | ENSP00000417210.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:1
The L260P variant in the LMOD3 gene has not been reported previously as a pathogenic variant, nor as a benign variant, to our knowledge. The L260P variant was not observed in approximately 6000 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, indicating it is not a common benign variant in these populations. The L260P variant is a semi-conservative amino acid substitution, which may impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in some properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is conserved across species and in silico analysis predicts this variant is probably damaging to the protein structure/function. The L260P variant is a strong candidate for a pathogenic variant, however the possibility it may be a rare benign variant cannot be excluded.
Nemaline myopathy 10 Uncertain:1
This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with LMOD3-related disease. This sequence change replaces leucine with proline at codon 260 of the LMOD3 protein (p.Leu260Pro). The leucine residue is highly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between leucine and proline. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at