chr3-87259973-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PM2PP2PP3_Strong
The NM_000306.4(POU1F1):c.797G>C(p.Arg266Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000306.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- pituitary hormone deficiency, combined, 1Inheritance: AR, SD, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
- combined pituitary hormone deficiencies, genetic formInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hypothyroidism due to deficient transcription factors involved in pituitary development or functionInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- isolated growth hormone deficiency type IIInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000306.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POU1F1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.797G>C | p.Arg266Thr | missense | Exon 6 of 6 | ENSP00000263781.2 | P28069-1 | ||
| POU1F1 | TSL:5 | c.875G>C | p.Arg292Thr | missense | Exon 6 of 6 | ENSP00000342931.3 | P28069-2 | ||
| POU1F1 | TSL:5 | c.572G>C | p.Arg191Thr | missense | Exon 5 of 5 | ENSP00000454072.1 | H0YNM5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at