chr3-8745627-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 2P and 11B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2
The ENST00000343849.3(CAV3):āc.216C>Gā(p.Cys72Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00217 in 1,614,132 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. C72Y) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000343849.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAV3 | NM_033337.3 | c.216C>G | p.Cys72Trp | missense_variant | 2/2 | ENST00000343849.3 | NP_203123.1 | |
CAV3 | NM_001234.5 | c.216C>G | p.Cys72Trp | missense_variant | 2/3 | NP_001225.1 | ||
OXTR | XR_007095681.1 | n.1885-3025G>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAV3 | ENST00000343849.3 | c.216C>G | p.Cys72Trp | missense_variant | 2/2 | 1 | NM_033337.3 | ENSP00000341940 | P1 | |
CAV3 | ENST00000397368.2 | c.216C>G | p.Cys72Trp | missense_variant | 2/3 | 1 | ENSP00000380525 | P1 | ||
CAV3 | ENST00000472766.1 | n.155+11637C>G | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00168 AC: 256AN: 152198Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00137 AC: 343AN: 251078Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00141 AC XY: 192AN XY: 135698
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00222 AC: 3252AN: 1461816Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00215 AC XY: 1561AN XY: 727202
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00168 AC: 256AN: 152316Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00149 AC XY: 111AN XY: 74488
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | Dec 07, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 07, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 09, 2018 | proposed classification - variant undergoing re-assessment, contact laboratory - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 13, 2020 | Variant summary: CAV3 c.216C>G (p.Cys72Trp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0014 in 283742 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0023 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 230 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CAV3 causing Arrhythmia phenotype (1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. c.216C>G has been reported in the literature in individuals with Muscular dystrophy, Long QT syndrome, Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome, Dilated cardiomyopathy or Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (McNally_1998, Arnestad_2007, Vatta_2006, Pugh_2014, Nunn_2015, Rubattu_2016, Sanchez_2016, Minoche_2018). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Arrhythmia. In addition, co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported (MYBPC3 c.1483C>T, p.Arg495Trp; TTN c.69491_69492del, p.Val23164fs) (Rubattu_2016, Minoche_2018), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. At least one publication reports this variant has no impact on protein function (Cai_2009). Ten ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cites the variant as uncertain significance (3x), likely benign (5x) and benign (2x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Dec 23, 2019 | - - |
not provided Benign:3Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Feb 12, 2020 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | curation | Leiden Muscular Dystrophy (CAV3) | Apr 15, 2012 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2022 | CAV3: BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 28, 2018 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25630502, 31043699, 27600940, 25783436, 9536092, 23465283, 11251997) - |
Caveolinopathy Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Nov 27, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego | Mar 18, 2019 | - - |
Rippling muscle disease 2 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Jan 01, 2005 | - - |
Elevated circulating creatine kinase concentration;C1832560:Rippling muscle disease 2;C2678485:Long QT syndrome 9;C3280443:Distal myopathy, Tateyama type;C3495498:Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Division of Human Genetics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Mar 16, 2016 | - - |
Long QT syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Aug 22, 2023 | - - |
CAV3-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Nov 05, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Long QT syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 07, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at