chr3-9473466-G-A
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_001080517.3(SETD5):c.3426G>A(p.Ala1142Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00013 in 1,613,764 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00014 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
SETD5
NM_001080517.3 synonymous
NM_001080517.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.28
Publications
0 publications found
Genes affected
SETD5 (HGNC:25566): (SET domain containing 5) This function of this gene has yet to be determined but based on sequence similarity to other SET domain proteins it may function as a histone methyltransferase. Mutations in this gene have been associated with an autosomal dominant form of intellectual disability. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2017]
SETD5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- intellectual disability-facial dysmorphism syndrome due to SETD5 haploinsufficiencyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- syndromic complex neurodevelopmental disorderInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (REVEL=0.011).
BP6
Variant 3-9473466-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-9473466-G-A is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 436690.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.28 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 205 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SETD5 | NM_001080517.3 | c.3426G>A | p.Ala1142Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 20 of 23 | ENST00000402198.7 | NP_001073986.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SETD5 | ENST00000402198.7 | c.3426G>A | p.Ala1142Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 20 of 23 | 5 | NM_001080517.3 | ENSP00000385852.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152118Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
152118
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000563 AC: 14AN: 248796 AF XY: 0.0000593 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
AC:
14
AN:
248796
AF XY:
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000140 AC: 205AN: 1461528Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000120 AC XY: 87AN XY: 727030 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
205
AN:
1461528
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
87
AN XY:
727030
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
44692
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
39690
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
86210
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
53394
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
196
AN:
1111788
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
60372
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.471
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12
25
37
50
62
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152236Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74436 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
152236
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74436
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
41536
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
15288
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
10602
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
68010
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
1
2
2
3
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Oct 23, 2015
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
not provided Benign:1
Jun 26, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.