chr4-102631740-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_005908.4(MANBA):c.*317A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.015 in 570,402 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 205 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.028 ( 143 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.010 ( 62 hom. )
Consequence
MANBA
NM_005908.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_005908.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.489
Genes affected
MANBA (HGNC:6831): (mannosidase beta) This gene encodes a member of the glycosyl hydrolase 2 family. The encoded protein localizes to the lysosome where it is the final exoglycosidase in the pathway for N-linked glycoprotein oligosaccharide catabolism. Mutations in this gene are associated with beta-mannosidosis, a lysosomal storage disease that has a wide spectrum of neurological involvement. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.97).
BP6
Variant 4-102631740-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-102631740-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 347070.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0773 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MANBA | NM_005908.4 | c.*317A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 17/17 | ENST00000647097.2 | ||
MANBA | XM_047415692.1 | c.*317A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 18/18 | |||
MANBA | XM_047415693.1 | c.*317A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 18/18 | |||
MANBA | XM_047415694.1 | c.*317A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 13/13 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MANBA | ENST00000647097.2 | c.*317A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 17/17 | NM_005908.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0283 AC: 4303AN: 152192Hom.: 139 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
4303
AN:
152192
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0101 AC: 4202AN: 418092Hom.: 62 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00923 AC XY: 2013AN XY: 218194
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
4202
AN:
418092
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
2013
AN XY:
218194
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0284 AC: 4326AN: 152310Hom.: 143 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0272 AC XY: 2023AN XY: 74494
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
4326
AN:
152310
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2023
AN XY:
74494
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 24, 2019 | - - |
Beta-D-mannosidosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at