chr4-10584947-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_052964.4(CLNK):c.92C>T(p.Pro31Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0523 in 1,613,330 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,511 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P31S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_052964.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLNK | NM_052964.4 | c.92C>T | p.Pro31Leu | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 19 | ENST00000226951.11 | NP_443196.2 | |
CLNK | XM_011513775.3 | c.137C>T | p.Pro46Leu | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 19 | XP_011512077.1 | ||
CLNK | XM_017007684.2 | c.137C>T | p.Pro46Leu | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 19 | XP_016863173.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0407 AC: 6190AN: 152116Hom.: 186 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0432 AC: 10731AN: 248444 AF XY: 0.0454 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0535 AC: 78149AN: 1461096Hom.: 2324 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0538 AC XY: 39134AN XY: 726774 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0407 AC: 6190AN: 152234Hom.: 187 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0405 AC XY: 3012AN XY: 74430 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at