chr4-15968341-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_006017.3(PROM1):c.*1052G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000361 in 152,248 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00036 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
PROM1
NM_006017.3 3_prime_UTR
NM_006017.3 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.612
Genes affected
PROM1 (HGNC:9454): (prominin 1) This gene encodes a pentaspan transmembrane glycoprotein. The protein localizes to membrane protrusions and is often expressed on adult stem cells, where it is thought to function in maintaining stem cell properties by suppressing differentiation. Mutations in this gene have been shown to result in retinitis pigmentosa and Stargardt disease. Expression of this gene is also associated with several types of cancer. This gene is expressed from at least five alternative promoters that are expressed in a tissue-dependent manner. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]
FGFBP2 (HGNC:29451): (fibroblast growth factor binding protein 2) This gene encodes a member of the fibroblast growth factor binding protein family. The encoded protein is a serum protein that is selectively secreted by cytotoxic lymphocytes and may be involved in cytotoxic lymphocyte-mediated immunity. An increase in the amount of gene product may be associated with atopic asthma and mild extrinsic asthma.[provided by RefSeq Staff, Oct 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BP6
Variant 4-15968341-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-15968341-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 347965.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000361 (55/152248) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0104 (50/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00808. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 41 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PROM1 | NM_006017.3 | c.*1052G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 28/28 | ENST00000447510.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PROM1 | ENST00000447510.7 | c.*1052G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 28/28 | 1 | NM_006017.3 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000362 AC: 55AN: 152130Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
55
AN:
152130
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0;AS_VQSRAC: 0AN: 0Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0AC XY: 0AN XY: 0
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0;AS_VQSR
AC:
0
AN:
0
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
0
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000361 AC: 55AN: 152248Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000551 AC XY: 41AN XY: 74450
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
55
AN:
152248
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
41
AN XY:
74450
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
12
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Stargardt disease 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Retinal macular dystrophy type 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Cone-rod dystrophy 12 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at