chr4-4303022-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_145291.4(ZBTB49):c.1186G>A(p.Ala396Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0104 in 1,613,982 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 106 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A396V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_145291.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZBTB49 | NM_145291.4 | c.1186G>A | p.Ala396Thr | missense_variant | 3/8 | ENST00000337872.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZBTB49 | ENST00000337872.9 | c.1186G>A | p.Ala396Thr | missense_variant | 3/8 | 1 | NM_145291.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00686 AC: 1044AN: 152152Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00735 AC: 1841AN: 250396Hom.: 10 AF XY: 0.00726 AC XY: 985AN XY: 135618
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0108 AC: 15779AN: 1461712Hom.: 102 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0104 AC XY: 7560AN XY: 727142
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00686 AC: 1044AN: 152270Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00580 AC XY: 432AN XY: 74452
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 03, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at