chr4-5576232-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_147127.5(EVC2):c.3272+8G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000633 in 1,614,130 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_147127.5 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVC2 | NM_147127.5 | c.3272+8G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000344408.10 | NP_667338.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVC2 | ENST00000344408.10 | c.3272+8G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_147127.5 | ENSP00000342144.5 | ||||
EVC2 | ENST00000310917.6 | c.3032+8G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000311683.2 | |||||
EVC2 | ENST00000475313.5 | n.3032+8G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000431981.1 | |||||
EVC2 | ENST00000509670.1 | n.*1665+8G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000423876.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00247 AC: 376AN: 152144Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000891 AC: 224AN: 251380Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000765 AC XY: 104AN XY: 135870
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000443 AC: 647AN: 1461868Hom.: 0 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.000472 AC XY: 343AN XY: 727238
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00246 AC: 375AN: 152262Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00242 AC XY: 180AN XY: 74448
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 11, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Mar 04, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 06, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Ellis-van Creveld syndrome;C0457013:Curry-Hall syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Ellis-van Creveld syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Apr 30, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at