chr4-5642651-T-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_147127.5(EVC2):c.1146-1813A>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.686 in 152,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 36,365 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_147127.5 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- acrofacial dysostosis, Weyers typeInheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Ellis-van Creveld syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_147127.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVC2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1146-1813A>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000342144.5 | Q86UK5-1 | |||
| EVC2 | TSL:1 | c.906-1813A>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000311683.2 | Q86UK5-2 | |||
| EVC2 | TSL:1 | n.906-1813A>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000431981.1 | A0A0C4DGE7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.685 AC: 104149AN: 151934Hom.: 36326 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.686 AC: 104237AN: 152052Hom.: 36365 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.682 AC XY: 50695AN XY: 74314 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at