chr4-6302151-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PM1PM2BP4
The NM_006005.3(WFS1):c.2356G>T(p.Gly786Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000103 in 1,460,600 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G786S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006005.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFS1 | NM_006005.3 | c.2356G>T | p.Gly786Cys | missense_variant | 8/8 | ENST00000226760.5 | NP_005996.2 | |
WFS1 | NM_001145853.1 | c.2356G>T | p.Gly786Cys | missense_variant | 8/8 | NP_001139325.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFS1 | ENST00000226760.5 | c.2356G>T | p.Gly786Cys | missense_variant | 8/8 | 1 | NM_006005.3 | ENSP00000226760 | P2 | |
ENST00000661896.1 | n.1337+1764C>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000405 AC: 1AN: 247126Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000744 AC XY: 1AN XY: 134432
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000103 AC: 15AN: 1460600Hom.: 0 Cov.: 99 AF XY: 0.00000963 AC XY: 7AN XY: 726608
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 34
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
WFS1-Related Spectrum Disorders Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 6 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at