chr4-78363540-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_025074.7(FRAS1):​c.2450C>T​(p.Ala817Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.518 in 1,612,438 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 225,496 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.43 ( 16251 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.53 ( 209245 hom. )

Consequence

FRAS1
NM_025074.7 missense

Scores

17

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0720

Publications

39 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
FRAS1 (HGNC:19185): (Fraser extracellular matrix complex subunit 1) This gene encodes an extracellular matrix protein that appears to function in the regulation of epidermal-basement membrane adhesion and organogenesis during development. Mutations in this gene cause Fraser syndrome, a multisystem malformation that can include craniofacial, urogenital and respiratory system abnormalities. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
FRAS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Fraser syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Fraser syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • renal agenesis, unilateral
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=1.239405E-5).
BP6
Variant 4-78363540-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-78363540-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 261805.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.552 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FRAS1NM_025074.7 linkc.2450C>T p.Ala817Val missense_variant Exon 21 of 74 ENST00000512123.4 NP_079350.5 Q86XX4-2
FRAS1NM_001166133.2 linkc.2450C>T p.Ala817Val missense_variant Exon 21 of 42 NP_001159605.1 Q86XX4-5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FRAS1ENST00000512123.4 linkc.2450C>T p.Ala817Val missense_variant Exon 21 of 74 5 NM_025074.7 ENSP00000422834.2 Q86XX4-2
FRAS1ENST00000325942.11 linkc.2450C>T p.Ala817Val missense_variant Exon 21 of 42 1 ENSP00000326330.6 Q86XX4-5
FRAS1ENST00000682513.1 linkc.2450C>T p.Ala817Val missense_variant Exon 21 of 64 ENSP00000508201.1 A0A804HL50
FRAS1ENST00000684159.1 linkc.2450C>T p.Ala817Val missense_variant Exon 21 of 45 ENSP00000506875.1 A0A804HI32

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.433
AC:
65716
AN:
151902
Hom.:
16241
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.192
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.538
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.508
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.482
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.202
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.368
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.586
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.373
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.556
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.452
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.484
AC:
119468
AN:
246848
AF XY:
0.481
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.181
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.551
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.485
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.198
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.589
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.560
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.506
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.527
AC:
769042
AN:
1460418
Hom.:
209245
Cov.:
47
AF XY:
0.522
AC XY:
379499
AN XY:
726422
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.177
AC:
5915
AN:
33462
American (AMR)
AF:
0.547
AC:
24402
AN:
44618
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.484
AC:
12617
AN:
26092
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.206
AC:
8167
AN:
39666
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.374
AC:
32200
AN:
86014
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.596
AC:
31734
AN:
53248
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.401
AC:
2311
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.560
AC:
622605
AN:
1111222
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.482
AC:
29091
AN:
60336
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
17563
35127
52690
70254
87817
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
17112
34224
51336
68448
85560
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.433
AC:
65749
AN:
152020
Hom.:
16251
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.432
AC XY:
32119
AN XY:
74302
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.191
AC:
7943
AN:
41490
American (AMR)
AF:
0.509
AC:
7782
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.482
AC:
1671
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.203
AC:
1045
AN:
5160
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.368
AC:
1771
AN:
4808
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.586
AC:
6187
AN:
10550
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.367
AC:
108
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.556
AC:
37796
AN:
67932
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.451
AC:
955
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1733
3466
5200
6933
8666
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
594
1188
1782
2376
2970
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.512
Hom.:
92108
Bravo
AF:
0.419
TwinsUK
AF:
0.565
AC:
2094
ALSPAC
AF:
0.559
AC:
2155
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.188
AC:
800
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.548
AC:
4650
ExAC
AF:
0.477
AC:
57739
Asia WGS
AF:
0.281
AC:
983
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 03, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fraser syndrome 1 Benign:3
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Aug 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.083
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.82
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
0.49
DANN
Benign
0.080
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.057
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.72
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.000012
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.94
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.65
N;N
PhyloP100
-0.072
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.55
N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.069
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T
Vest4
0.034
ClinPred
0.0053
T
GERP RS
0.56
gMVP
0.50
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.080
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs6835769; hg19: chr4-79284694; COSMIC: COSV53590044; API