chr4-78511299-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_025074.7(FRAS1):c.9806G>A(p.Arg3269Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00942 in 1,603,438 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 95 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R3269R) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_025074.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRAS1 | NM_025074.7 | c.9806G>A | p.Arg3269Gln | missense_variant | 64/74 | ENST00000512123.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRAS1 | ENST00000512123.4 | c.9806G>A | p.Arg3269Gln | missense_variant | 64/74 | 5 | NM_025074.7 | P1 | |
FRAS1 | ENST00000682513.1 | c.9806G>A | p.Arg3269Gln | missense_variant | 64/64 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00564 AC: 858AN: 152114Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00518 AC: 1276AN: 246530Hom.: 9 AF XY: 0.00480 AC XY: 642AN XY: 133646
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00982 AC: 14252AN: 1451206Hom.: 92 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00944 AC XY: 6793AN XY: 719792
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00564 AC: 858AN: 152232Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00543 AC XY: 404AN XY: 74428
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 21, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Sep 14, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 09, 2022 | Variant summary: FRAS1 c.9806G>A (p.Arg3269Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0052 in 246530 control chromosomes (gnomAD), predominantly at a frequency of 0.0093 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 5 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in FRAS1 causing Cryptophthalmos Syndrome (0.0018), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. Five ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: three classified the variant as likely benign, and two as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jan 01, 2024 | FRAS1: BS2 - |
Fraser syndrome 1 Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Apr 03, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia Other:1
risk factor, no assertion criteria provided | research | Daryl Scott Lab, Baylor College of Medicine | Nov 09, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at