chr5-112840499-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_000038.6(APC):c.4905G>A(p.Gly1635=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000713 in 1,614,102 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G1635G) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000038.6 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | NM_000038.6 | c.4905G>A | p.Gly1635= | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000257430.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | ENST00000257430.9 | c.4905G>A | p.Gly1635= | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | 5 | NM_000038.6 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000296 AC: 45AN: 152118Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000374 AC: 94AN: 251208Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000435 AC XY: 59AN XY: 135764
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000757 AC: 1106AN: 1461866Hom.: 2 Cov.: 66 AF XY: 0.000782 AC XY: 569AN XY: 727238
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000296 AC: 45AN: 152236Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000269 AC XY: 20AN XY: 74438
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2023 | APC: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 25, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Apr 24, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 16, 2016 | Variant summary: The APC c.4905G>A (p.Gly1635Gly) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 3/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing and the variant is cited in UMD as having normal splicing via RT-PCR, without evidence to independently evaluate. This variant was found in 46/121378 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000379, which is approximately 5 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic APC variant (0.0000714), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. The variant was reported in an affected individual in the literature, without strong evidence for causality. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 23, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Dec 18, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 14, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Feb 21, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Dec 18, 2015 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 06, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | May 03, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Mar 10, 2021 | - - |
APC-Associated Polyposis Disorders Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at