chr5-112840844-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_000038.6(APC):c.5250C>T(p.Val1750Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000229 in 1,613,910 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V1750V) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000038.6 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- classic or attenuated familial adenomatous polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- desmoid tumorInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- familial adenomatous polyposis 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomachInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet
- sarcomaInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- APC-related attenuated familial adenomatous polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Turcot syndrome with polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Cenani-Lenz syndactyly syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000038.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APC | NM_000038.6 | MANE Select | c.5250C>T | p.Val1750Val | synonymous | Exon 16 of 16 | NP_000029.2 | ||
| APC | NM_001407446.1 | c.5334C>T | p.Val1778Val | synonymous | Exon 16 of 16 | NP_001394375.1 | |||
| APC | NM_001354896.2 | c.5304C>T | p.Val1768Val | synonymous | Exon 17 of 17 | NP_001341825.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APC | ENST00000257430.9 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.5250C>T | p.Val1750Val | synonymous | Exon 16 of 16 | ENSP00000257430.4 | ||
| APC | ENST00000508376.6 | TSL:1 | c.5250C>T | p.Val1750Val | synonymous | Exon 17 of 17 | ENSP00000427089.2 | ||
| APC | ENST00000508624.5 | TSL:1 | n.*4572C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 17 of 17 | ENSP00000424265.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152102Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000519 AC: 13AN: 250620 AF XY: 0.0000590 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000246 AC: 36AN: 1461808Hom.: 0 Cov.: 63 AF XY: 0.0000275 AC XY: 20AN XY: 727204 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152102Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74302 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
APC: BP4
The APC p.Val1750= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the following databases: MutDB, UMD-LSDB, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs2229997) as “With Likely benign allele”, ClinVar (as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Invitae, Counsyl, and Color Genomics), Clinvitae (2x), Cosmic (in a tumour in the large intestine), and LOVD 3.0 (1x). The variant was identified in control databases in 13 of 245396 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000053 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: European (Non-Finnish) in 1 of 111010 chromosomes (freq: 0.000009), and Ashkenazi Jewish in 12 of 9812 chromosomes (freq: 0.001223); it was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, East Asian, European (Finnish), and South Asian populations. The p.Val1750= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign.
Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Benign:3
This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing.
This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com.
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
not specified Benign:1
Classic or attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis Benign:1
APC-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at