chr5-132559358-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The ENST00000638452.2(ENSG00000283782):c.-94C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR premature start codon gain change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000118 in 1,607,832 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ENSG00000283782
ENST00000638452.2 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.57

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

COSMIC-nc: COSV104531640

Genes affected

ENSG00000283782 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000283782 links:

RAD50 (HGNC:9816): (RAD50 double strand break repair protein) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50, a protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair. This protein forms a complex with MRE11 and NBS1. The protein complex binds to DNA and displays numerous enzymatic activities that are required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends. This protein, cooperating with its partners, is important for DNA double-strand break repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, telomere maintenance, and meiotic recombination. Knockout studies of the mouse homolog suggest this gene is essential for cell growth and viability. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

RAD50 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
familial ovarian cancer
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
hereditary breast carcinoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

RAD50 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.39).

BP6

Variant 5-132559358-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132559358-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 184336.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RAD50	NM_005732.4 link	c.204C>T	p.His68His	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 25	ENST00000378823.8	NP_005723.2	Q92878-1A5D6Y3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ENSG00000283782	ENST00000638452.2 link	c.-94C>T		5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain_variant	Exon 4 of 27	5		ENSP00000492349.2	A0A1W2PQ90
RAD50	ENST00000378823.8 link	c.204C>T	p.His68His	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 25	1	NM_005732.4	ENSP00000368100.4	Q92878-1
ENSG00000283782	ENST00000638452.2 link	c.-94C>T		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 4 of 27	5		ENSP00000492349.2	A0A1W2PQ90

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152040

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000221

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000959

AC:

AN:

250328

AF XY:

0.000140

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000626

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000119

AC:

173

AN:

1455792

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000128

AC XY:

AN XY:

723978

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000120

AC:

AN:

33400

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44626

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26026

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39446

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000826

AC:

AN:

84714

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000169

AC:

AN:

53114

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5488

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000133

AC:

147

AN:

1108868

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000832

AC:

AN:

60110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.411

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152040

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000943

AC XY:

AN XY:

74260

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41376

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000655

AC:

AN:

15270

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000192

AC:

AN:

5202

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10574

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000221

AC:

AN:

68004

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2088

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.510

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000145

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000982

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jul 29, 2024

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The RAD50 c.204C>T (p.His68=) synonymous variant has not been reported in individuals with RAD50-related conditions in the published literature. The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00018 (9/50606 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using software algorithms for the prediction of the effect of nucleotide changes on splicing yielded predictions that this variant does not affect RAD50 mRNA splicing. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

RAD50: BP4, BP7 -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Jan 08, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 11, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Nov 17, 2022

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder

Benign:1

Mar 26, 2018

Counsyl

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.39

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.70

PhyloP100

1.6

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=289/11

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over