chr5-132595776-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_005732.4(RAD50):c.2173C>T(p.Arg725Trp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000502 in 1,612,366 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000049 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RAD50
NM_005732.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.56

Variant links:

Genes affected

RAD50 (HGNC:9816): (RAD50 double strand break repair protein) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50, a protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair. This protein forms a complex with MRE11 and NBS1. The protein complex binds to DNA and displays numerous enzymatic activities that are required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends. This protein, cooperating with its partners, is important for DNA double-strand break repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, telomere maintenance, and meiotic recombination. Knockout studies of the mouse homolog suggest this gene is essential for cell growth and viability. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

RAD50 links:

ENSG00000283782 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000283782 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.05563113).

BP6

Variant 5-132595776-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132595776-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 142505.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_benign=2}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RAD50	NM_005732.4 link	c.2173C>T	p.Arg725Trp	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 25	ENST00000378823.8	NP_005723.2	Q92878-1A5D6Y3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RAD50	ENST00000378823.8 link	c.2173C>T	p.Arg725Trp	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 25	1	NM_005732.4	ENSP00000368100.4		Q92878-1
ENSG00000283782	ENST00000640655.2 link	c.1876C>T	p.Arg626Trp	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 26	5		ENSP00000491596.2		A0A1W2PQ90

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000592

AC:

AN:

152082

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000479

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000225

AC:

AN:

249438

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000156

AC XY:

AN XY:

134848

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000617

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00156

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000493

AC:

AN:

1460284

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000385

AC XY:

AN XY:

726528

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00143

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000540

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000592

AC:

AN:

152082

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000942

AC XY:

AN XY:

74276

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000479

Bravo

AF:

0.000178

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000227

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000140

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Oct 18, 2021	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Nov 18, 2024	This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with tryptophan, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 725 of the RAD50 protein (p.Arg725Trp). This variant is present in population databases (rs369560280, gnomAD 0.2%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 24894818, 30262796). This missense change has been observed to co-occur in individuals with a different variant in RAD50 that has been determined to be pathogenic (internal data), but the significance of this finding is unclear. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 142505). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt RAD50 protein function with a positive predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Nov 05, 2024

The RAD50 c.2173C>T (p.Arg725Trp) variant has been reported in women affected with or at-risk for breast cancer (PMID: 24894818 (2014), 30262796 (2018)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0015 (54/35406 chromosomes in Latino/Admixed American subpopulation, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

not specified

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Jan 02, 2018

Variant summary: The RAD50 c.2173C>T (p.Arg725Trp) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide that is located in the RAD50, zinc hook domain (InterPro). 3/3 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 55/275042 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the Latino subpopulation at a frequency of 0.001541 (53/34384). This frequency is about 25 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic RAD50 variant (0.0000625), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of Latino origin. The variant has been cited in the literature, though it is unclear whether it was identified in breast cancer cases or control individuals (Damiola_2014; Young_2016). Two clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as one of uncertain significance. Taken together, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.29

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.26

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.17

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.38

.;.;.;T

Eigen

Uncertain

0.50

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.58

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.96

LIST_S2

Pathogenic

0.98

.;.;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.0052

MetaRNN

Benign

0.056

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.1

.;.;.;M

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.57

REVEL

Benign

0.17

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.011

.;.;.;D

Polyphen

0.98

.;.;.;D

Vest4

0.52

MVP

0.60

ClinPred

0.22

GERP RS

5.1

Varity_R

0.57

gMVP

0.55

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over