chr5-132604951-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_005732.4(RAD50):c.2670G>A(p.Gln890Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000409 in 1,614,018 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0021 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00023 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

RAD50
NM_005732.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.88

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RAD50 (HGNC:9816): (RAD50 double strand break repair protein) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50, a protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair. This protein forms a complex with MRE11 and NBS1. The protein complex binds to DNA and displays numerous enzymatic activities that are required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends. This protein, cooperating with its partners, is important for DNA double-strand break repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, telomere maintenance, and meiotic recombination. Knockout studies of the mouse homolog suggest this gene is essential for cell growth and viability. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

RAD50 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
familial ovarian cancer
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
hereditary breast carcinoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

RAD50 links:

ENSG00000283782 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000283782 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).

BP6

Variant 5-132604951-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132604951-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 142441.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.88 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00212 (323/152334) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00686 (285/41564). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0062. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 146 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RAD50	NM_005732.4 link	c.2670G>A	p.Gln890Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 16 of 25	ENST00000378823.8	NP_005723.2	Q92878-1A5D6Y3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RAD50	ENST00000378823.8 link	c.2670G>A	p.Gln890Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 16 of 25	1	NM_005732.4	ENSP00000368100.4		Q92878-1
ENSG00000283782	ENST00000638452.2 link	c.2373G>A	p.Gln791Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 27	5		ENSP00000492349.2		A0A1W2PQ90

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00209

AC:

318

AN:

152216

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00676

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00203

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00335

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000501

AC:

126

AN:

251286

AF XY:

0.000405

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00641

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000434

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000652

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000231

AC:

337

AN:

1461684

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000179

AC XY:

130

AN XY:

727138

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00744

AC:

249

AN:

33476

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000716

AC:

AN:

44716

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39690

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86246

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53406

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000520

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000630

AC:

AN:

1111860

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000745

AC:

AN:

60388

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.470

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00212

AC:

323

AN:

152334

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00196

AC XY:

146

AN XY:

74502

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00686

AC:

285

AN:

41564

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

15310

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5192

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00331

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.500

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00107

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00264

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Aug 03, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 30, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 23, 2014

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jan 08, 2018

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The RAD50 c.2670G>A (p.Gln890Gln) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide causing a synonymous change and 4/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may alter ESE binding. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 176/277102 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.006285 (151/24026). This frequency is about 101 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic RAD50 variant (0.0000625), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories classified this variant as benign/likely benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -

Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder

Benign:3

Oct 15, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

- -

Jun 03, 2016

Counsyl

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Feb 01, 2025

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 29, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

RAD50-related disorder

Benign:1

Mar 08, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not provided

Benign:1

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Familial cancer of breast

Benign:1

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.42

CADD

Benign

7.5

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.73

PhyloP100

1.9

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over