chr5-132618083-T-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The ENST00000378823.8(RAD50):c.3178T>A(p.Leu1060Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000167 in 1,613,020 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L1060W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000378823.8 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD50 | NM_005732.4 | c.3178T>A | p.Leu1060Met | missense_variant | 21/25 | ENST00000378823.8 | NP_005723.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD50 | ENST00000378823.8 | c.3178T>A | p.Leu1060Met | missense_variant | 21/25 | 1 | NM_005732.4 | ENSP00000368100 | P1 | |
RAD50 | ENST00000533482.5 | c.*2804T>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 21/25 | 1 | ENSP00000431225 | ||||
RAD50 | ENST00000651249.1 | c.16T>A | p.Leu6Met | missense_variant | 1/6 | ENSP00000498257 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000399 AC: 1AN: 250760Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000737 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135702
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000164 AC: 24AN: 1460840Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000110 AC XY: 8AN XY: 726792
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74348
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 19, 2024 | This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 1060 of the RAD50 protein (p.Leu1060Met). This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.0009%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RAD50-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 220636). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt RAD50 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 15, 2023 | The p.L1060M variant (also known as c.3178T>A), located in coding exon 21 of the RAD50 gene, results from a T to A substitution at nucleotide position 3178. The leucine at codon 1060 is replaced by methionine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Jan 08, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at