chr5-138287173-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_001790.5(CDC25C):c.1022T>A(p.Ile341Asn) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000274 in 1,457,716 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001790.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001790.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDC25C | MANE Select | c.1022T>A | p.Ile341Asn | missense | Exon 11 of 14 | NP_001781.2 | P30307-1 | ||
| CDC25C | c.1256T>A | p.Ile419Asn | missense | Exon 11 of 14 | NP_001274512.1 | ||||
| CDC25C | c.1193T>A | p.Ile398Asn | missense | Exon 10 of 13 | NP_001350955.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDC25C | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1022T>A | p.Ile341Asn | missense | Exon 11 of 14 | ENSP00000321656.6 | P30307-1 | ||
| CDC25C | TSL:2 | c.1022T>A | p.Ile341Asn | missense | Exon 11 of 14 | ENSP00000424795.1 | P30307-1 | ||
| CDC25C | c.1022T>A | p.Ile341Asn | missense | Exon 11 of 14 | ENSP00000590963.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251200 AF XY: 0.0000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1457716Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 725510 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at