chr5-13865871-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):​c.4152A>G​(p.Thr1384Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.467 in 1,606,262 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 178,262 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.49 ( 18244 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.47 ( 160018 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH5
NM_001369.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0420
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 5-13865871-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13865871-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 178751.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-13865871-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.042 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.563 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DNAH5NM_001369.3 linkc.4152A>G p.Thr1384Thr synonymous_variant Exon 27 of 79 ENST00000265104.5 NP_001360.1 Q8TE73

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DNAH5ENST00000265104.5 linkc.4152A>G p.Thr1384Thr synonymous_variant Exon 27 of 79 1 NM_001369.3 ENSP00000265104.4 Q8TE73
DNAH5ENST00000681290.1 linkc.4107A>G p.Thr1369Thr synonymous_variant Exon 27 of 79 ENSP00000505288.1 A0A7P0Z455
ENSG00000251423ENST00000503244.2 linkn.253+5316T>C intron_variant Intron 1 of 2 4
ENSG00000251423ENST00000637153.1 linkn.213+5356T>C intron_variant Intron 1 of 2 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.486
AC:
73749
AN:
151872
Hom.:
18216
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.569
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.364
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.379
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.393
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.331
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.522
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.508
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.367
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.472
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.465
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.449
AC:
112264
AN:
249798
Hom.:
26237
AF XY:
0.455
AC XY:
61603
AN XY:
135316
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.572
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.312
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.398
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.322
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.538
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.500
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.467
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.430
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.465
AC:
676687
AN:
1454272
Hom.:
160018
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.467
AC XY:
337688
AN XY:
723858
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.580
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.321
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.396
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.324
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.530
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.499
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.469
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.456
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.486
AC:
73840
AN:
151990
Hom.:
18244
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.483
AC XY:
35885
AN XY:
74316
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.569
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.379
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.393
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.332
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.524
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.508
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.472
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.468
Alfa
AF:
0.460
Hom.:
29803
Bravo
AF:
0.474
Asia WGS
AF:
0.455
AC:
1584
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.454
EpiControl
AF:
0.452

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 26, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3 Benign:3
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 30, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 15, 2021
Pars Genome Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
Feb 21, 2013
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Thr1384Thr in exon 27 of DNAH5: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wi thin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 46.7% (4011/8592) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequ encing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs7703349). -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Nov 10, 2018
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
1.1
DANN
Benign
0.61

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7703349; hg19: chr5-13865980; COSMIC: COSV54212563; API