chr5-161847787-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PVS1_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2
The ENST00000428797.7(GABRA1):c.-248+1G>T variant causes a splice donor change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000696 in 152,276 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000428797.7 splice_donor
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOC105377696 | XR_941158.4 | n.74+2733C>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | ||||
GABRA1 | NM_001127643.2 | c.-248+1G>T | splice_donor_variant | ||||
GABRA1 | NM_000806.5 | c.-248+376G>T | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABRA1 | ENST00000428797.7 | c.-248+1G>T | splice_donor_variant | 1 | P1 | ||||
GABRA1 | ENST00000023897.10 | c.-248+376G>T | intron_variant | 1 | P1 | ||||
GABRA1 | ENST00000635096.1 | c.-248+74G>T | intron_variant | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000697 AC: 106AN: 152158Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 8Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 6
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000696 AC: 106AN: 152276Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000779 AC XY: 58AN XY: 74458
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, 19 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Centogene AG - the Rare Disease Company | Jun 18, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at