chr5-177280721-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 9 ACMG points: 9P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3_Moderate
The ENST00000439151.7(NSD1):c.5779G>C(p.Ala1927Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A1927D) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000439151.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSD1 | NM_022455.5 | c.5779G>C | p.Ala1927Pro | missense_variant | 18/23 | ENST00000439151.7 | NP_071900.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSD1 | ENST00000439151.7 | c.5779G>C | p.Ala1927Pro | missense_variant | 18/23 | 1 | NM_022455.5 | ENSP00000395929 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 26, 2023 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29304373, 26690673) - |
Sotos syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc | Nov 01, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at