chr5-178149823-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_017838.4(NHP2):c.352G>A(p.Ala118Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00073 in 1,613,520 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0033 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00047 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

NHP2
NM_017838.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.08

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

NHP2 (HGNC:14377): (NHP2 ribonucleoprotein) This gene is a member of the H/ACA snoRNPs (small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins) gene family. snoRNPs are involved in various aspects of rRNA processing and modification and have been classified into two families: C/D and H/ACA. The H/ACA snoRNPs also include the DKC1, NOLA1 and NOLA3 proteins. These four H/ACA snoRNP proteins localize to the dense fibrillar components of nucleoli and to coiled (Cajal) bodies in the nucleus. Both 18S rRNA production and rRNA pseudouridylation are impaired if any one of the four proteins is depleted. The four H/ACA snoRNP proteins are also components of the telomerase complex. This gene encodes a protein related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nhp2p. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

NHP2 links:

RMND5B (HGNC:26181): (required for meiotic nuclear division 5 homolog B) Predicted to enable metal ion binding activity and ubiquitin protein ligase activity. Predicted to contribute to ubiquitin-protein transferase activity. Predicted to be involved in proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process. Located in cytosol. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

RMND5B links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010230422).

BP6

Variant 5-178149823-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-178149823-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 416618.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NHP2	NM_017838.4 link	c.352G>A	p.Ala118Thr	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 4	ENST00000274606.8	NP_060308.1
RMND5B	NM_022762.5 link	c.*1791C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 11 of 11	ENST00000313386.9	NP_073599.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NHP2	ENST00000274606.8 link	c.352G>A	p.Ala118Thr	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 4	1	NM_017838.4	ENSP00000274606.4
RMND5B	ENST00000313386.9 link	c.*1791C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 11 of 11	1	NM_022762.5	ENSP00000320623.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00327

AC:

497

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0114

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000851

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00144

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00106

AC:

265

AN:

250778

AF XY:

0.000768

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0124

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000928

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00130

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000656

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000465

AC:

680

AN:

1461224

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000395

AC XY:

287

AN XY:

726824

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0126

AC:

422

AN:

33468

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00112

AC:

AN:

44644

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00111

AC:

AN:

26094

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39678

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000116

AC:

AN:

86162

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000187

AC:

AN:

53406

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000347

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000103

AC:

114

AN:

1111648

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000861

AC:

AN:

60360

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.482

Heterozygous variant carriers

103

138

172

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00327

AC:

498

AN:

152296

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00295

AC XY:

220

AN XY:

74474

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0114

AC:

474

AN:

41550

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000850

AC:

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00142

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.503

Heterozygous variant carriers

115

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00353

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00376

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000539

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00931

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000233

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00105

AC:

127

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:1

Dec 11, 2017

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Feb 12, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

Dyskeratosis congenita

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

NHP2-related disorder

Benign:1

Sep 27, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.54

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.42

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.37

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.95

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.13

Eigen

Benign

-0.24

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.13

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.95

LIST_S2

Benign

0.84

MetaRNN

Benign

0.010

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

PhyloP100

6.1

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.52

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.99

REVEL

Benign

0.062

Sift

Benign

0.61

Sift4G

Benign

0.30

Polyphen

0.018

Vest4

0.23

MVP

0.74

MPC

0.39

ClinPred

0.035

GERP RS

4.4

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.92

RBP_regulation_power_radar

2.0

Varity_R

0.12

gMVP

0.51

Mutation Taster

=76/24

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over