chr5-37060988-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_133433.4(NIPBL):ā€‹c.7830G>Cā€‹(p.Val2610=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00242 in 1,614,042 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0025 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

NIPBL
NM_133433.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.72
Variant links:
Genes affected
NIPBL (HGNC:28862): (NIPBL cohesin loading factor) This gene encodes the homolog of the Drosophila melanogaster Nipped-B gene product and fungal Scc2-type sister chromatid cohesion proteins. The Drosophila protein facilitates enhancer-promoter communication of remote enhancers and plays a role in developmental regulation. It is also homologous to a family of chromosomal adherins with broad roles in sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, and DNA repair. The human protein has a bipartite nuclear targeting sequence and a putative HEAT repeat. Condensins, cohesins and other complexes with chromosome-related functions also contain HEAT repeats. Mutations in this gene result in Cornelia de Lange syndrome, a disorder characterized by dysmorphic facial features, growth delay, limb reduction defects, and cognitive disability. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).
BP6
Variant 5-37060988-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-37060988-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 159238.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-37060988-G-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.72 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00181 (276/152248) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00309 (210/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00274. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 147 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 276 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
NIPBLNM_133433.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.7830G>C p.Val2610= synonymous_variant 45/47 ENST00000282516.13

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
NIPBLENST00000282516.13 linkuse as main transcriptc.7830G>C p.Val2610= synonymous_variant 45/471 NM_133433.4 P1Q6KC79-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00181
AC:
276
AN:
152130
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000217
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00462
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00309
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00185
AC:
465
AN:
251200
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00171
AC XY:
232
AN XY:
135752
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000308
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000925
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000496
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00365
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00408
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00248
AC:
3626
AN:
1461794
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00245
AC XY:
1785
AN XY:
727194
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000917
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000765
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00404
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00285
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00177
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00181
AC:
276
AN:
152248
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00198
AC XY:
147
AN XY:
74424
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000217
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00462
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00309
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.00240
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00137
EpiCase
AF:
0.00234
EpiControl
AF:
0.00154

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMar 21, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 19, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoFeb 08, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jul 22, 2015- -
Cornelia de Lange syndrome 1 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 15, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 24, 2024- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 15, 2016This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMay 01, 2024NIPBL: BP4, BS1 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.43
CADD
Benign
8.4
DANN
Benign
0.71

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs115668015; hg19: chr5-37061090; API