chr5-37815858-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000514.4(GDNF):c.429G>A(p.Arg143Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00471 in 1,614,070 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 345 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.025 ( 193 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0026 ( 152 hom. )

Consequence

GDNF
NM_000514.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.843

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

GDNF (HGNC:4232): (glial cell derived neurotrophic factor) This gene encodes a secreted ligand of the TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) superfamily of proteins. Ligands of this family bind various TGF-beta receptors leading to recruitment and activation of SMAD family transcription factors that regulate gene expression. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate each subunit of the disulfide-linked homodimer. The recombinant form of this protein, a highly conserved neurotrophic factor, was shown to promote the survival and differentiation of dopaminergic neurons in culture, and was able to prevent apoptosis of motor neurons induced by axotomy. This protein is a ligand for the product of the RET (rearranged during transfection) protooncogene. Mutations in this gene may be associated with Hirschsprung disease and Tourette syndrome. This gene encodes multiple protein isoforms that may undergo similar proteolytic processing. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

GDNF links:

GDNF-AS1 (HGNC:43592): (GDNF antisense RNA 1)

GDNF-AS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.44).

BP6

Variant 5-37815858-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-37815858-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 163500.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.843 with no splicing effect.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0864 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GDNF	NM_000514.4 link	c.429G>A	p.Arg143Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 3	ENST00000326524.7	NP_000505.1	P39905-1A0A0S2Z3V2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GDNF	ENST00000326524.7 link	c.429G>A	p.Arg143Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 3	1	NM_000514.4	ENSP00000317145.2		P39905-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0253

AC:

3853

AN:

152100

Hom.:

193

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0888

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00727

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.0158

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000309

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0177

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00665

AC:

1672

AN:

251470

AF XY:

0.00490

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0913

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00373

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000992

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000316

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00244

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00256

AC:

3743

AN:

1461852

Hom.:

152

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00224

AC XY:

1630

AN XY:

727230

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0902

AC:

3021

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00416

AC:

186

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000115

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000255

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000187

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00433

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000127

AC:

141

AN:

1111974

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00570

AC:

344

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.481

Heterozygous variant carriers

214

428

641

855

1069

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

184

276

368

460

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0254

AC:

3862

AN:

152218

Hom.:

193

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0244

AC XY:

1818

AN XY:

74450

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0888

AC:

3687

AN:

41512

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00720

AC:

110

AN:

15288

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000415

AC:

AN:

4820

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10612

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.0170

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000309

AC:

AN:

68016

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0175

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.495

Heterozygous variant carriers

165

330

496

661

826

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

120

160

200

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0129

Hom.:

132

Bravo

AF:

0.0276

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000273

EpiControl

AF:

0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Apr 10, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 12, 2018

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10917288) -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Dec 27, 2013

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hirschsprung disease, susceptibility to, 3

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.44

CADD

Benign

6.9

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.52

PhyloP100

0.84

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism (auto)

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over