chr5-60599205-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_018369.3(DEPDC1B):c.1298G>A(p.Arg433His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000484 in 1,611,822 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R433C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018369.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_018369.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEPDC1B | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1298G>A | p.Arg433His | missense | Exon 10 of 11 | ENSP00000265036.5 | Q8WUY9-1 | ||
| DEPDC1B | c.1295G>A | p.Arg432His | missense | Exon 10 of 11 | ENSP00000541308.1 | ||||
| DEPDC1B | c.1298G>A | p.Arg433His | missense | Exon 10 of 11 | ENSP00000597186.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152060Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000145 AC: 36AN: 248430 AF XY: 0.000164 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000425 AC: 62AN: 1459644Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000496 AC XY: 36AN XY: 725978 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000121 AC XY: 9AN XY: 74412 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at