chr5-80437449-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001284236.3(ZFYVE16):āc.764T>Cā(p.Met255Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000621 in 1,449,670 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001284236.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZFYVE16 | NM_001284236.3 | c.764T>C | p.Met255Thr | missense_variant | 4/19 | ENST00000505560.5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZFYVE16 | ENST00000505560.5 | c.764T>C | p.Met255Thr | missense_variant | 4/19 | 1 | NM_001284236.3 | P1 | |
FAM151B-DT | ENST00000666568.1 | n.259-22982A>G | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000621 AC: 9AN: 1449670Hom.: 0 Cov.: 67 AF XY: 0.00000555 AC XY: 4AN XY: 720406
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 19, 2022 | The c.764T>C (p.M255T) alteration is located in exon 4 (coding exon 2) of the ZFYVE16 gene. This alteration results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 764, causing the methionine (M) at amino acid position 255 to be replaced by a threonine (T). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at