chr5-89301402-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBS1BS2
The ENST00000686965.1(ENSG00000288740):n.638C>T variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.02 in 152,044 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 40 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000686965.1 non_coding_transcript_exon
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: ENST00000686965.1. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEF2C-AS1 | NR_136217.1 | n.382-75881G>A | intron | N/A | |||||
| MEF2C-AS1 | NR_136218.1 | n.535-75881G>A | intron | N/A | |||||
| MEF2C-AS1 | NR_136219.1 | n.568-75881G>A | intron | N/A |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENSG00000288740 | ENST00000686965.1 | n.638C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 3 of 3 | |||||
| ENSG00000288740 | ENST00000692568.1 | n.1688C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 1 of 1 | |||||
| ENSG00000288740 | ENST00000693054.2 | n.542C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0201 AC: 3051AN: 151926Hom.: 40 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0200 AC: 3048AN: 152044Hom.: 40 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0200 AC XY: 1486AN XY: 74338 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at