chr6-116497003-A-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM2PP3_Moderate
The NM_001139444.3(TRAPPC3L):c.497T>G(p.Ile166Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000492 in 1,546,180 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I166V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001139444.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001139444.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRAPPC3L | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.497T>G | p.Ile166Arg | missense | Exon 5 of 5 | ENSP00000357591.3 | Q5T215-1 | ||
| TRAPPC3L | TSL:3 | c.455T>G | p.Ile152Arg | missense | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000395769.1 | A0A0A0MSL6 | ||
| TRAPPC3L | TSL:2 | c.245T>G | p.Ile82Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000348445.4 | Q5T215-2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151980Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000199 AC: 3AN: 150810 AF XY: 0.0000251 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000538 AC: 75AN: 1394200Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000553 AC XY: 38AN XY: 687464 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151980Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74214 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at