chr6-129291620-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000426.4(LAMA2):c.2756G>T(p.Arg919Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00852 in 1,613,110 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 749 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R919G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000426.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMA2 | NM_000426.4 | c.2756G>T | p.Arg919Leu | missense_variant | 20/65 | ENST00000421865.3 | |
LAMA2 | NM_001079823.2 | c.2756G>T | p.Arg919Leu | missense_variant | 20/64 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMA2 | ENST00000421865.3 | c.2756G>T | p.Arg919Leu | missense_variant | 20/65 | 5 | NM_000426.4 | ||
LAMA2 | ENST00000618192.5 | c.2756G>T | p.Arg919Leu | missense_variant | 20/66 | 5 | P1 | ||
LAMA2 | ENST00000617695.5 | c.2756G>T | p.Arg919Leu | missense_variant | 20/64 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0413 AC: 6287AN: 152106Hom.: 377 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0116 AC: 2909AN: 251366Hom.: 157 AF XY: 0.00882 AC XY: 1198AN XY: 135856
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00508 AC: 7418AN: 1460886Hom.: 371 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00469 AC XY: 3411AN XY: 726832
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0415 AC: 6318AN: 152224Hom.: 378 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0394 AC XY: 2931AN XY: 74450
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 18, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 15, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 18, 2012 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
LAMA2-related muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Congenital muscular dystrophy due to partial LAMA2 deficiency Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at