chr6-145735264-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM1BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_005670.4(EPM2A):​c.235G>C​(p.Gly79Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000646 in 1,517,924 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G79C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00036 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000031 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

EPM2A
NM_005670.4 missense

Scores

2
6
11

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:5B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0390

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
EPM2A (HGNC:3413): (EPM2A glucan phosphatase, laforin) This gene encodes a dual-specificity phosphatase and may be involved in the regulation of glycogen metabolism. The protein acts on complex carbohydrates to prevent glycogen hyperphosphorylation, thus avoiding the formation of insoluble aggregates. Loss-of-function mutations in this gene have been associated with Lafora disease, a rare, adult-onset recessive neurodegenerative disease, which results in myoclonus epilepsy and usually results in death several years after the onset of symptoms. The disease is characterized by the accumulation of insoluble particles called Lafora bodies, which are derived from glycogen. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2018]
EPM2A-DT (HGNC:48990): (EPM2A divergent transcript)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 3 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 0 benign, 14 uncertain in NM_005670.4
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.05141419).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000363 (55/151558) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00123 (51/41504). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000959. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 18 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
EPM2ANM_005670.4 linkc.235G>C p.Gly79Arg missense_variant Exon 1 of 4 ENST00000367519.9 NP_005661.1 O95278-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
EPM2AENST00000367519.9 linkc.235G>C p.Gly79Arg missense_variant Exon 1 of 4 1 NM_005670.4 ENSP00000356489.3 O95278-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000363
AC:
55
AN:
151450
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000961
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000513
AC:
7
AN:
136456
AF XY:
0.0000133
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00122
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000440
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000315
AC:
43
AN:
1366366
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0000222
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
675480
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00130
AC:
37
AN:
28530
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000294
AC:
1
AN:
33970
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
23552
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
32294
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
76918
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
46140
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5374
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
1063776
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000896
AC:
5
AN:
55812
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.460
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
9
12
15
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000363
AC:
55
AN:
151558
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000243
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
74078
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00123
AC:
51
AN:
41504
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15234
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3462
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5132
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10356
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
67728
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000951
AC:
2
AN:
2104
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.486
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
10
13
16
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000229
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000563
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000469
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.0000718
AC:
8

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2
Nov 11, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 15, 2024
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Lafora disease Uncertain:1
Oct 31, 2018
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Aug 01, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.G79R variant (also known as c.235G>C), located in coding exon 1 of the EPM2A gene, results from a G to C substitution at nucleotide position 235. The glycine at codon 79 is replaced by arginine, an amino acid with dissimilar properties. This amino acid position is well conserved on limited sequence alignment. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear. -

Progressive myoclonic epilepsy Uncertain:1
Oct 18, 2022
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 79 of the EPM2A protein (p.Gly79Arg). This variant is present in population databases (rs374826256, gnomAD 0.2%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with EPM2A-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 193326). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

EPM2A-related disorder Benign:1
Apr 08, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.21
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.084
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.090
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.42
T;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.24
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.23
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.79
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.77
T;T;.;T
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.89
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.051
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.16
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.7
L;L;L;L
PhyloP100
0.039
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.81
D
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.74
N;.;.;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.55
Sift
Benign
0.36
T;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.27
T;T;.;.
Polyphen
0.26
B;B;B;.
Vest4
0.16
MVP
0.96
MPC
0.37
ClinPred
0.12
T
GERP RS
2.2
PromoterAI
-0.0060
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
gMVP
0.49
Mutation Taster
=86/14
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs374826256; hg19: chr6-146056400; API