chr6-152122621-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_182961.4(SYNE1):​c.26209G>A​(p.Gly8737Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00842 in 1,614,110 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 518 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 69 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0082 ( 449 hom. )

Consequence

SYNE1
NM_182961.4 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.54
Variant links:
Genes affected
SYNE1 (HGNC:17089): (spectrin repeat containing nuclear envelope protein 1) This gene encodes a spectrin repeat containing protein expressed in skeletal and smooth muscle, and peripheral blood lymphocytes, that localizes to the nuclear membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 8, also referred to as autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type 1 or recessive ataxia of Beauce. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
ESR1 (HGNC:3467): (estrogen receptor 1) This gene encodes an estrogen receptor and ligand-activated transcription factor. The canonical protein contains an N-terminal ligand-independent transactivation domain, a central DNA binding domain, a hinge domain, and a C-terminal ligand-dependent transactivation domain. The protein localizes to the nucleus where it may form either a homodimer or a heterodimer with estrogen receptor 2. The protein encoded by this gene regulates the transcription of many estrogen-inducible genes that play a role in growth, metabolism, sexual development, gestation, and other reproductive functions and is expressed in many non-reproductive tissues. The receptor encoded by this gene plays a key role in breast cancer, endometrial cancer, and osteoporosis. This gene is reported to have dozens of transcript variants due to the use of alternate promoters and alternative splicing, however, the full-length nature of many of these variants remain uncertain. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00387156).
BP6
Variant 6-152122621-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-152122621-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 130435.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0923 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SYNE1NM_182961.4 linkc.26209G>A p.Gly8737Ser missense_variant Exon 146 of 146 ENST00000367255.10 NP_892006.3
SYNE1NM_001347702.2 linkc.2743G>A p.Gly915Ser missense_variant Exon 18 of 18 ENST00000354674.5 NP_001334631.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SYNE1ENST00000367255.10 linkc.26209G>A p.Gly8737Ser missense_variant Exon 146 of 146 1 NM_182961.4 ENSP00000356224.5 Q8NF91-1
SYNE1ENST00000354674.5 linkc.2743G>A p.Gly915Ser missense_variant Exon 18 of 18 5 NM_001347702.2 ENSP00000346701.4 F8WAI0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0109
AC:
1651
AN:
152160
Hom.:
69
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000579
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00151
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00375
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0992
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0373
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0721
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00165
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0101
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0185
AC:
4661
AN:
251344
Hom.:
172
AF XY:
0.0191
AC XY:
2589
AN XY:
135852
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000800
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000520
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00337
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.104
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0365
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0607
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00164
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0122
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00816
AC:
11932
AN:
1461832
Hom.:
449
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00895
AC XY:
6510
AN XY:
727210
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000448
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000581
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00241
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.109
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0355
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0578
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000541
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0120
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0109
AC:
1653
AN:
152278
Hom.:
69
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0149
AC XY:
1112
AN XY:
74444
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00375
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0994
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0377
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0721
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00165
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00995
Alfa
AF:
0.00188
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00507
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000778
AC:
3
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000681
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00140
AC:
12
ExAC
AF:
0.0176
AC:
2139
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0650
AC:
225
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Aug 08, 2016
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Feb 05, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 05, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type;C2751807:Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.073
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.68
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.64
CADD
Benign
0.26
DANN
Benign
0.75
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.099
T;.;.;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.5
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.5
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.059
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.70
T;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0039
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.49
N;.;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.019
Sift
Benign
0.97
T;.;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.52
T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0010
B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.064
MPC
0.13
ClinPred
0.0023
T
GERP RS
-4.8
Varity_R
0.058
gMVP
0.32

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2295191; hg19: chr6-152443756; COSMIC: COSV54934875; COSMIC: COSV54934875; API