chr6-152219009-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2_Supporting

The NM_182961.4(SYNE1):ā€‹c.22038A>Gā€‹(p.Ser7346=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000787 in 1,613,978 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000079 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000079 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SYNE1
NM_182961.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.96
Variant links:
Genes affected
SYNE1 (HGNC:17089): (spectrin repeat containing nuclear envelope protein 1) This gene encodes a spectrin repeat containing protein expressed in skeletal and smooth muscle, and peripheral blood lymphocytes, that localizes to the nuclear membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 8, also referred to as autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type 1 or recessive ataxia of Beauce. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).
BP6
Variant 6-152219009-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-152219009-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 283035.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.96 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 12 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SYNE1NM_182961.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.22038A>G p.Ser7346= synonymous_variant 120/146 ENST00000367255.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SYNE1ENST00000367255.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.22038A>G p.Ser7346= synonymous_variant 120/1461 NM_182961.4 P1Q8NF91-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000788
AC:
12
AN:
152240
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000478
AC:
12
AN:
251062
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000516
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
135690
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000969
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000787
AC:
115
AN:
1461620
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000756
AC XY:
55
AN XY:
727134
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000998
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000662
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000788
AC:
12
AN:
152358
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000805
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74520
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000213
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000604
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMay 22, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 17, 2016- -
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type;C2751807:Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeAug 21, 2023- -
Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.78
CADD
Benign
0.37
DANN
Benign
0.53

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201392317; hg19: chr6-152540144; API