chr6-152444444-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_182961.4(SYNE1):c.3804G>A(p.Leu1268Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.011 in 1,613,908 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 115 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_182961.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYNE1 | NM_182961.4 | c.3804G>A | p.Leu1268Leu | synonymous_variant | Exon 30 of 146 | ENST00000367255.10 | NP_892006.3 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00899 AC: 1367AN: 152142Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00900 AC: 2262AN: 251372Hom.: 14 AF XY: 0.00906 AC XY: 1231AN XY: 135850
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0113 AC: 16464AN: 1461650Hom.: 107 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0111 AC XY: 8097AN XY: 727114
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00897 AC: 1365AN: 152258Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00841 AC XY: 626AN XY: 74448
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
- -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:3
SYNE1: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
- -
- -
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type;C2751807:Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
- -
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
SYNE1-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type;C2751807:Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant;C5193121:Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita 3, myogenic type Benign:1
- -
Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at