chr6-1610947-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001453.3(FOXC1):c.502C>T(p.Leu168Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000641 in 1,613,550 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0033 ( 2 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00036 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

FOXC1
NM_001453.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.99

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

FOXC1 (HGNC:3800): (forkhead box C1) This gene belongs to the forkhead family of transcription factors which is characterized by a distinct DNA-binding forkhead domain. The specific function of this gene has not yet been determined; however, it has been shown to play a role in the regulation of embryonic and ocular development. Mutations in this gene cause various glaucoma phenotypes including primary congenital glaucoma, autosomal dominant iridogoniodysgenesis anomaly, and Axenfeld-Rieger anomaly. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

FOXC1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

anterior segment dysgenesis 3
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome type 3
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
aniridia
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
Axenfeld anomaly
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
isolated aniridia
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Peters anomaly
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Rieger anomaly
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

FOXC1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).

BP6

Variant 6-1610947-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-1610947-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 167086.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.99 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00331 (503/151914) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0115 (476/41500). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0106. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 228 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 503 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001453.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	FOXC1	NM_001453.3	MANE Select	c.502C>T	p.Leu168Leu	synonymous	Exon 1 of 1	NP_001444.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	FOXC1	ENST00000645831.2	MANE Select	c.502C>T	p.Leu168Leu	synonymous	Exon 1 of 1	ENSP00000493906.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00332

AC:

504

AN:

151794

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0115

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000853

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000883

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00385

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000814

AC:

204

AN:

250574

AF XY:

0.000597

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0117

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000884

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000364

AC:

532

AN:

1461636

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000341

AC XY:

248

AN XY:

727120

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0124

AC:

414

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000224

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000464

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53194

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000694

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000459

AC:

AN:

1111994

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000811

AC:

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.477

Heterozygous variant carriers

126

168

210

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00331

AC:

503

AN:

151914

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00307

AC XY:

228

AN XY:

74240

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0115

AC:

476

AN:

41500

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000852

AC:

AN:

15264

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3466

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5086

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4808

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10584

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

290

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000884

AC:

AN:

67904

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00381

AC:

AN:

2102

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.488

Heterozygous variant carriers

104

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00132

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00357

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Jul 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

FOXC1: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2

Jun 06, 2019

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified

Benign:1

Apr 28, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

FOXC1-related disorder

Benign:1

Jan 02, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome type 3

Benign:1

Jan 06, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.53

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.98

PhyloP100

2.0

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over