chr6-18122304-C-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_198586.3(NHLRC1):​c.303G>T​(p.Pro101=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000687 in 1,588,684 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0039 ( 6 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00035 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

NHLRC1
NM_198586.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.80
Variant links:
Genes affected
NHLRC1 (HGNC:21576): (NHL repeat containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a single subunit E3 ubiquitin ligase. Laforin is polyubiquitinated by the encoded protein. Defects in this intronless gene lead to an accumulation of laforin and onset of Lafora disease, also known as progressive myoclonic epilepsy type 2 (EPM2).[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.7).
BP6
Variant 6-18122304-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-18122304-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 138522.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-18122304-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.8 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00389 (593/152292) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0138 (572/41578). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0128. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 278 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 6 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
NHLRC1NM_198586.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.303G>T p.Pro101= synonymous_variant 1/1 ENST00000340650.6 NP_940988.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NHLRC1ENST00000340650.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.303G>T p.Pro101= synonymous_variant 1/1 NM_198586.3 ENSP00000345464 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00390
AC:
594
AN:
152174
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0138
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000982
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000910
AC:
184
AN:
202248
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000588
AC XY:
66
AN XY:
112332
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0137
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000388
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000343
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000559
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000381
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000347
AC:
498
AN:
1436392
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.000270
AC XY:
193
AN XY:
714062
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0119
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000546
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000234
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000334
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000602
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00389
AC:
593
AN:
152292
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00373
AC XY:
278
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0138
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000980
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.000214
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00391

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 28, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 02, 2012This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Lafora disease Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMay 01, 2023NHLRC1: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicJun 15, 2017- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJan 08, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.70
CADD
Benign
1.0
DANN
Benign
0.83

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs187783545; hg19: chr6-18122535; API