chr6-30703429-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_014641.3(MDC1):āc.5671A>Gā(p.Thr1891Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000735 in 1,613,956 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 28 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014641.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDC1 | NM_014641.3 | c.5671A>G | p.Thr1891Ala | missense_variant | 11/15 | ENST00000376406.8 | |
MDC1-AS1 | NR_133647.1 | n.127+236T>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDC1 | ENST00000376406.8 | c.5671A>G | p.Thr1891Ala | missense_variant | 11/15 | 5 | NM_014641.3 | P1 | |
MDC1-AS1 | ENST00000442150.1 | n.127+236T>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 3 | |||||
MDC1 | ENST00000489540.1 | n.653A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/5 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00129 AC: 196AN: 152224Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00248 AC: 617AN: 248566Hom.: 17 AF XY: 0.00233 AC XY: 314AN XY: 134874
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000678 AC: 991AN: 1461614Hom.: 26 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000769 AC XY: 559AN XY: 727110
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00128 AC: 195AN: 152342Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00166 AC XY: 124AN XY: 74490
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jun 15, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at