chr6-33165778-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_080680.3(COL11A2):c.4521G>A(p.Gln1507Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00307 in 1,613,348 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0032 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

COL11A2
NM_080680.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.82

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

COL11A2 (HGNC:2187): (collagen type XI alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes one of the two alpha chains of type XI collagen, a minor fibrillar collagen. It is located on chromosome 6 very close to but separate from the gene for retinoid X receptor beta. Type XI collagen is a heterotrimer but the third alpha chain is a post-translationally modified alpha 1 type II chain. Proteolytic processing of this type XI chain produces PARP, a proline/arginine-rich protein that is an amino terminal domain. Mutations in this gene are associated with type III Stickler syndrome, otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia (OSMED syndrome), Weissenbacher-Zweymuller syndrome, autosomal dominant non-syndromic sensorineural type 13 deafness (DFNA13), and autosomal recessive non-syndromic sensorineural type 53 deafness (DFNB53). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. A related pseudogene is located nearby on chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]

COL11A2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 13
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal dominant
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 53
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia
Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
fibrochondrogenesis
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

COL11A2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).

BP6

Variant 6-33165778-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-33165778-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 162977.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.82 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00177 (269/152254) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00318 (216/68016). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00283. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 105 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 9 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL11A2	NM_080680.3 link	c.4521G>A	p.Gln1507Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 63 of 66	ENST00000341947.7	NP_542411.2	P13942A0A0C4DFS1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL11A2	ENST00000341947.7 link	c.4521G>A	p.Gln1507Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 63 of 66	5	NM_080680.3	ENSP00000339915.2	A0A0C4DFS1
COL11A2	ENST00000374708.8 link	c.4263G>A	p.Gln1421Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 61 of 64	5		ENSP00000363840.4	Q4VXY6
COL11A2	ENST00000477772.1 link	n.311G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 6 of 9	2
COL11A2	ENST00000683572.1 link	n.327G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 6 of 9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00177

AC:

269

AN:

152136

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000893

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000327

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000660

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00318

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000955

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00162

AC:

404

AN:

250102

AF XY:

0.00177

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000741

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00110

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00297

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00320

AC:

4678

AN:

1461094

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00310

AC XY:

2254

AN XY:

726772

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000597

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000313

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000325

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000969

AC:

AN:

52636

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00400

AC:

4449

AN:

1112002

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00190

AC:

115

AN:

60390

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.483

Heterozygous variant carriers

313

626

939

1252

1565

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

184

368

552

736

920

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00177

AC:

269

AN:

152254

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00141

AC XY:

105

AN XY:

74442

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000890

AC:

AN:

41556

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000327

AC:

AN:

15298

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5152

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000414

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000660

AC:

AN:

10614

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00318

AC:

216

AN:

68016

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000945

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00212

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00178

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00305

EpiControl

AF:

0.00261

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

Feb 01, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

COL11A2: BP4, BP7 -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:3

Dec 12, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 30, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Gln1507Gln in Exon 63 of COL11A2: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.4% (26/7020) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenc ing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs114580597). -

Sep 13, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Connective tissue disorder

Benign:2

Nov 01, 2016

Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 19, 2021

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal dominant

Benign:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal recessive

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Stickler Syndrome, Dominant

Benign:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fibrochondrogenesis 2

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.42

CADD

Benign

9.9

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.78

PhyloP100

1.8

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over