chr6-36200381-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2
The NM_015695.3(BRPF3):c.59C>T(p.Pro20Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000105 in 1,614,242 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_015695.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_015695.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRPF3 | NM_015695.3 | MANE Select | c.59C>T | p.Pro20Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 13 | NP_056510.2 | Q9ULD4-1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRPF3 | ENST00000357641.10 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.59C>T | p.Pro20Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 13 | ENSP00000350267.6 | Q9ULD4-1 | |
| BRPF3 | ENST00000926626.1 | c.59C>T | p.Pro20Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 13 | ENSP00000596685.1 | |||
| BRPF3 | ENST00000926627.1 | c.59C>T | p.Pro20Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 13 | ENSP00000596686.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152236Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 251306 AF XY: 0.0000368 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000103 AC: 15AN: 1461888Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000110 AC XY: 8AN XY: 727246 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152354Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000268 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74514 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at